The intensive care unit psychosocial care scale: Development and initial validation

Hariharan, Meena; Chivukula, Usha; Rana, Suvashisa

doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2015.06.003

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In some cases, we found that the four elements of psychosocial fundamental care were only a small component of the entire tool: this is the case, for example, with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, Hospital version (HCAHPS), in which we found, among 27 items, reference to fundamental care in only two items related to patients’ respect (Levin et al, 2017; Ng et al, 2009; Otani, Herrmann, & Kurz, 2011). For 10 other instruments, we found the same limitations (Spiritual Care Needs Inventory (SCNI‐21): Wu, Koo, Tseng, Liao, & Chen, 2015; questionnaire used by Kim, Han, & Kim, 2017; Person‐Centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ‐P): Johnston, Gaffney, Pringle, & Buchanan, 2015; The intensive care unit psychosocial care scale (ICU‐PC Scale): Hariharan, Chivukula, & Rana, 2015; National Survey of English Inpatients: Hargreaves, Sizmur, & Viner, 2012; Chinese Comfort, Afford, Respect, and Expect scale (CARE‐C): Chung, Hsieh, Chen, Chang, & Hsu, 2018; questionnaire used by Chen & Raingruber, 2014; questionnaire used by Chaplin, Crawshaw, & Hood, 2015; Flemish Patient Survey (FPS): Bruyneel et al, 2017; Thai Nurses’ Caring Behavior Scale (TNCBS): Udomluck, Tonmukayakul, Tiansawad, & Srisuphan, 2010). Other studies, even though they did not specifically set out to investigate of the four elements of psychosocial fundamentals care, used instruments that could investigate all four elements.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 73%

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Bagnasco

Zanini

Dasso

et al. 2020

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and objectives:To synthesise and review literature related to instruments that measure psychosocial aspects of fundamental care in acute hospital care settings.Background: Psychosocial aspects of care often receive less priority in terms of care provision in acute care environments. At the same time, if these elements are overlooked, there may be consequences. Despite the availability of many instruments designed to measure specific aspects of care, these concepts are often not studied within the broader context of fundamentals of care, but rather coexist as isolated explorations of specific subelements. Design:A scoping review was conducted, based on Arksey & O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework and following the PRISMA checklist. Methods: Using the five recommended steps-identifying the research question; identifying relevant studies; study selection; charting the data; and summarising and reporting the results-three databases were searched: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE, in February 2019.Results: Following independent screening by two of the authors, 48 papers were included. From these 48 papers, 33 instruments were identified. Only five of these tools thoroughly assessed psychosocial aspects elements of care (dignity, respect, privacy and patients' choice) through dedicated items. Conclusions:This review provides nurses with a synthesis of 33 instruments that assess the psychosocial aspects of care. This provides an important resource to guide measurement of dignity, respect, privacy and patients' choice. The findings also provide guidance to future research in this field. | 1833 BAGNASCO et Al. S U PP O RTI N G I N FO R M ATI O N Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section. How to cite this article: Bagnasco A, Zanini M, Dasso N, et al. Dignity, privacy, respect and choice-A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 73%

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Bagnasco

Zanini

Dasso

et al. 2020

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Psychosocial care encompasses the interventions necessary to help patients cope more effectively with life crises or psychiatric disorders that affect their physical and emotional health and healthcare. The emotional reactions of the patient may prolong hospitalization or nursing care, hinder compliance with care, and may deplete the patient’s physiological and emotional resources . However, early interventions by nurses can improve patients’ coping abilities towards health crises and disease …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Addressing the psychosocial needs of patients: Challenges for nursing students

Mersin

Demiralp

Öksüz

2019

Perspect Psychiatr Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the ability of nursing students to determine the psychosocial needs of patients and identify the needs and problems encountered by nursing students. Design and methods This study is a mixed method research. The nursing care plans of 40 nursing students that provided care to 129 patients with chronic medical diseases were examined retrospectively. Individual interviews were also conducted with five nursing students and six academicians. Findings It was determined that nursing students defined an average of 15.77 ± 11.55 physiological and an average of 3.05 ± 2.28 psychosocial nursing diagnoses for 129 patients. Data analysis of individual interviews revealed two main themes: (1) identifying psychosocial diagnoses: teaching difficulties and (2) identifying psychosocial diagnoses: learning difficulties. Practice implications This can facilitate the learning process of each student to include physiological and a psychosocial care focus in their nursing care through discussions and evaluation with their mentors and instructors.

show abstract

“…Therefore, development and standardization of instruments to measure knowledge of hypertension are the need of the hour. The procedure of standardization should adhere to the standard procedures involving steps such as item writing, item analysis, reliability, validity testing (Baliz-Erkoc, Isikli, Metintas, & Kalyoncu, 2012), factor analysis where appropriate (Hariharan, Chivukula, & Rana, 2015;Hariharan, Thomas, & Rana, 2015) or base on item response theory (Han et al, 2011).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hypertension Knowledge Test: Development and Validation

Andrew

2017

Int J Indian Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses the process of development and validation of Hypertension Knowledge Test on a total sample of 614 hypertensive patients recruited in three stages. Standard procedure of test development was followed. The final form of the test consisted of 22 items hierarchically arranged following the criteria of item difficulty and item discrimination. The test measures four dimensions of knowledge viz. General awareness, Lifestyle, Causes, Care, Casualty awareness and Management of medication. The test–retest reliability was 0.92 (p<.001).The construct validity measured by correlating hypertension knowledge scores with Blood Pressure readings was highly significant (p<0.01).

show abstract

The intensive care unit psychosocial care scale: Development and initial validation

Cited by 4 publications

References 38 publications

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Addressing the psychosocial needs of patients: Challenges for nursing students

Hypertension Knowledge Test: Development and Validation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About