2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41297-018-0045-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intellectual quality and inclusivity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander content in the NSW Stage 5 History syllabus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the positive effect of teaching skills like goals setting or self-regulation on student achievement (Hattie, 2008) and on cognitive development (Bayat & Tarmizi, 2010;Venville & Oliver, 2015), they are rarely addressed explicitly in learning objectives or seen worthy of separately allocated lesson time, and are often considered to be less academic than cognitive skills (Kereluik et al, 2013;Marzano & Kendall, 2008). An analysis of 15 different chemistry syllabi in Turkey showed that the cognitive domain dominates learning goals (Pekdağ & Erol, 2013) and more locally, Morris and Burgess (2018) highlight the very limited usage of metacognitive knowledge dimensions in in the Australian history curriculum as well as the previous New South Wales history curriculum. This could be the case because it is difficult to reach a consensus about the successful mastery of certain metacognitive or emotive skills that cannot be observed directly, i.e.…”
Section: Metacognitive and Self-system Thinking As Implicit Curriculu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the positive effect of teaching skills like goals setting or self-regulation on student achievement (Hattie, 2008) and on cognitive development (Bayat & Tarmizi, 2010;Venville & Oliver, 2015), they are rarely addressed explicitly in learning objectives or seen worthy of separately allocated lesson time, and are often considered to be less academic than cognitive skills (Kereluik et al, 2013;Marzano & Kendall, 2008). An analysis of 15 different chemistry syllabi in Turkey showed that the cognitive domain dominates learning goals (Pekdağ & Erol, 2013) and more locally, Morris and Burgess (2018) highlight the very limited usage of metacognitive knowledge dimensions in in the Australian history curriculum as well as the previous New South Wales history curriculum. This could be the case because it is difficult to reach a consensus about the successful mastery of certain metacognitive or emotive skills that cannot be observed directly, i.e.…”
Section: Metacognitive and Self-system Thinking As Implicit Curriculu...mentioning
confidence: 99%