2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-021-09988-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Demands of the Reformed Queensland Physics, Chemistry and Biology Syllabus: An Analysis Framed by the New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

Abstract: demands of the reformed Queensland physics, chemistry and biology syllabus: an analysis framed by the New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Research in Science Education, .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the investigators have re-subdivided the categories of cognitive learning by Bloom into three: lower, mid, and upper (as against two: lower and upper), and find out that the WASSCE as found in the English questions of 2020 do not cover the Senior Secondary Schools, but, the Primary and the Junior Secondary Schools (upper primary school)-a contradiction to both the Piaget theory of Cognitive Development and to the Bloom taxonomy of cognitive learning. This finding is in line with the work of Claudia et al who find out that the cognitive levels of learning objectives are tilted to the lower order rational skills recovery and understanding in syllabi of the three major science subjects: biology, chemistry, and physics (Claudia, Helen, & Maree, 2021). This type of situation where both the syllabi and the test questions are in the lower domain reduces the quality of teaching and learning with a resultant effect of quality of education output.…”
Section: Discussion On Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, the investigators have re-subdivided the categories of cognitive learning by Bloom into three: lower, mid, and upper (as against two: lower and upper), and find out that the WASSCE as found in the English questions of 2020 do not cover the Senior Secondary Schools, but, the Primary and the Junior Secondary Schools (upper primary school)-a contradiction to both the Piaget theory of Cognitive Development and to the Bloom taxonomy of cognitive learning. This finding is in line with the work of Claudia et al who find out that the cognitive levels of learning objectives are tilted to the lower order rational skills recovery and understanding in syllabi of the three major science subjects: biology, chemistry, and physics (Claudia, Helen, & Maree, 2021). This type of situation where both the syllabi and the test questions are in the lower domain reduces the quality of teaching and learning with a resultant effect of quality of education output.…”
Section: Discussion On Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Cognitive skills are precisely those skills that help construct knowledge, make assumptions, develop competence and the ability to solve problems and formulate results (Hasanah & Shimizu, 2020). In fact, STEM curricula define the knowledge and skills to be acquired in a subject, indicating what is worth learning and what kind of thinking is valued (Johnson et al, 2022). In essence, STEM curricula should focus on (a) STEM-specific knowledge and skills, fostering the development of higher-level thinking; (b) competencies specifically, but not exclusively, related to STEM (e.g., critical and creative thinking); and (c) generic competences (e.g., collaborative or communicative skills) that can be productively developed in a STEM context (Siekmann & Korbel, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In science education, it is important to be able to use epistemological knowledge, procedural knowledge, and technical knowledge. This means knowing science content, integrating it into other subjects, interpreting information, engaging in research, reasoning logically and using real-life examples to solve problems (Johnson et al, 2022;Ng, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of contextbased chemistry learning can be presented in Table 1 below. Cognitive aspects are aspects related to reasoning or thinking processes to be able to solve a particular problem (Johnson et al, 2021). Some of the cognitive aspects investigated include learning achievement, conceptual understanding, metacognitive abilities, chemical literacy, critical thinking skills, argumentative skills, scientific thinking habits, creative thinking skills, memory skills, and understanding of scientific texts.…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%