The Integration of Deliberative Mini-publics in Collaborative Governance Through the Perspectives of Citizens and Stakeholders: The Case of the Education Reform in French-speaking Belgium

Vrydagh, Julien; Devillers, Sophie; Reuchamps, Min

doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1853599

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These elements are essential for sustainable economic and social development (Bevir, 2012;Handayani and Nur, 2019). Collaborative governance is an effective strategy for problem-solving, involving diverse stakeholders and their perspectives, knowledge and resources (Ansell and Gash, 2008;Vrydagh et al, 2020). The stages of collaborative governance, as described by Morse and Stephens (2012), include initial conditions, processes and benefits.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Public policymakers can engage non-governmental entities in decision-making through collaborative governance (Evans et al, 2006;Jung et al, 2009;Emerson et al, 2012;Innes and Booher, 2015), Voogd and Woltjer in (Handoko et al, 2019) and deLeon and Gallagher in (Kurniasih, 2017). Recent studies have linked collaborative governance to educational activities, with Vrydagh et al (2020) emphasizing its encouragement through panels and conferences. Additionally, a framework model has been proposed for the collaboration between airlines and universities in the aviation industry (Lutte and Mills, 2019).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2006; Jung et al ., 2009; Emerson et al ., 2012; Innes and Booher, 2015), Voogd and Woltjer in (Handoko et al ., 2019) and deLeon and Gallagher in (Kurniasih, 2017). Recent studies have linked collaborative governance to educational activities, with Vrydagh et al. (2020) emphasizing its encouragement through panels and conferences.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Collaborative governance for aviation approved training organisation: an adapted model for multi-stakeholder collaboration

Hendra,

Kurnianto,

Endrawijaya

2023

HESWBL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aimed to develop an adapted collaborative governance model for aviation human resource development in Indonesia's approved training organisations (ATO), considering the expected changes in the industry due to advanced technologies. The model, based on Ansell and Gash's approach, emphasizes multi-stakeholder collaboration to ensure workforce development aligns with industry and regulatory standards and accommodates technological advancements.Design/methodology/approachQualitative methods, such as in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, were employed to collect and analyse data.FindingsThe results indicated that collaborative governance is a valuable tool for cultivating competent human resources and facilitating industry improvement in the face of rapid technological change.Originality/valueThe proposed model contributes significantly to the field by promoting inclusive and effective human resource development through the Centre for Aviation Human Resource Development (CAHRD), thereby preparing the Indonesian aviation industry for the impact of advanced technologies. Furthermore, this study contributes to the enhancement of Ansell and Gash's collaborative governance theoretical framework by effectively addressing its empirical gaps concerning vocational education and training challenges within Indonesia's air transportation sector.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Collaborative governance for aviation approved training organisation: an adapted model for multi-stakeholder collaboration

Hendra,

Kurnianto,

Endrawijaya

2023

HESWBL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The literature has made progress in ascertaining the basis of minipublics' legitimacy among participants. Perceived diversity and effectiveness in providing a forum for a deliberative exchange of ideas tend to be viewed as legitimate justifications for their recommendations to weigh on public decisions (Caluwaerts & Reuchamps 2018;Vrydagh et al 2020). However, securing legitimacy among the panel of participants is insufficient.…”

Section: Awareness Interest and Legitimacymentioning

confidence: 99%

Looking in from the Outside: How Do Invited But Not Selected Citizens Perceive the Legitimacy of a Minipublic?

Devillers¹,

Vrydagh

Caluwaerts

et al. 2021

Journal of Deliberative Democracy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deliberative minipublics are often critiqued for being disconnected with mass democracy. This is problematic from the perspective of legitimacy. If ordinary citizens are not aware of the existence of minipublics, how can citizens consent to the process and outcomes of these processes? One possible design innovation is to widen the pool of citizens randomly invited to take part in minipublics. While not all invited individuals will be selected to join minipublics, inviting a large pool of people, at the very least, may trigger their curiosity to closely observe and scrutinise the debates and recommendations of their fellow citizens. Our article examines the viability of this design feature using the case study of the citizen panel ‘Make Your Brussels – Mobility’. We focus on a group of 336 people who accepted the invitation to participate in the citizen panel but were not among the 40 people selected to participate. We have two major findings. First, despite their initial interest in taking part in a minipublic, these citizens did not follow up on their interest in the minipublic. Second, these citizens do not perceive citizen panels as capable of delivering consensual outcomes. We conclude the article by drawing out implications for deliberative practice, especially in enhancing the legitimacy of minipublics.

show abstract

Does federalism enhance representative democracy? Perpetual reform and shifting power in a divided Belgium

Brenton

2022

Journal of Contemporary European Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Integration of Deliberative Mini-publics in Collaborative Governance Through the Perspectives of Citizens and Stakeholders: The Case of the Education Reform in French-speaking Belgium

Abstract: with details of the nature of the infringement. We will investigate the claim and if justified, we will take the appropriate steps.

Cited by 4 publications

References 52 publications

Collaborative governance for aviation approved training organisation: an adapted model for multi-stakeholder collaboration

Collaborative governance for aviation approved training organisation: an adapted model for multi-stakeholder collaboration

Looking in from the Outside: How Do Invited But Not Selected Citizens Perceive the Legitimacy of a Minipublic?

Does federalism enhance representative democracy? Perpetual reform and shifting power in a divided Belgium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About