1983
DOI: 10.21236/ada132251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Instructional Quality Inventory (IQI): A Formative Evaluation Tool for Instructional Systems Development

Abstract: Reviewed is the development and evaluation of the instructional quality inventory (IQI), a systematic methodology for reviewing the three major products-of the Instructional Systems Design process-objectives, test items, and instruction-before conducting student tryouts. The empirically based instructional design support system aids de'velopers in choosing instructional alternatives based on cost/benefits and specific resource ' *

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NAVPERSRANDCEN developed a scheme for classifying objectives as part of the Instructional Quality Inventory (IQ) (Montague, Ellis, & Wulfeck, 1983). The IQI scheme classifies objectivei according to (1) what the student must do (i.e., the task the itudent must perform), and (2) the instructional content (i.e., the type of information the student must learn).…”
Section: Problem and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAVPERSRANDCEN developed a scheme for classifying objectives as part of the Instructional Quality Inventory (IQ) (Montague, Ellis, & Wulfeck, 1983). The IQI scheme classifies objectivei according to (1) what the student must do (i.e., the task the itudent must perform), and (2) the instructional content (i.e., the type of information the student must learn).…”
Section: Problem and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if the purpose(s) behind the development of an evaluation system for a particular training program is not clearly specified during the initial analysis or needs assessment phase, it is unlikely that the appropriate information will be collected to link subsequent evaluation data with training needs reassessment. Without a clear sense of purpose, modifications to enhance the quality of the training program must rely on the intuition of the people who develop the training program (Montague & Wulfeck, 1986).…”
Section: Typaliat Ion Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%