2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.04438
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The InSight HP$^3$ Penetrator (Mole) on Mars: Soil Properties Derived From the Penetration Attempts and Related Activities

Abstract: The NASA InSight Lander on Mars includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP 3 to measure the surface heat flow of the planet. The package uses temperature sensors that would have been brought to the target depth of 3-5 m by a small penetrator, nicknamed the mole. The mole requiring friction on its hull to balance remaining recoil from its hammer mechanism did not penetrate to the targeted depth. Instead, by precessing about a point midway along its hull, it carved a 7 cm deep and 5-6 cm wide pit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This made initial experimentation much more difficult Knapmeyer, Fischer, Knollenberg, Seidensticker, Thiel, Arnold, Faber, et al 2018. The Rosetta mission was launched in 2004, the problem was encountered in 2014, but surprisingly, the same problem occurred again during the InSight HP3 seismic experiment, launched in 2018, when the seismometer SEIS was listening for seismic waves produced by the hammer of the HP 3 heat flow probe (Spohn, Hudson, et al 2021;Sollberger, Schmelzbach, Andersson, et al 2020). The lack of a joint time signal between the two instruments HP 3 and SEIS meant that a convoluted process was necessary to infer the exact time of each hammer blow from the seismic signal itself, significantly increasing the uncertainty of the observation.…”
Section: Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This made initial experimentation much more difficult Knapmeyer, Fischer, Knollenberg, Seidensticker, Thiel, Arnold, Faber, et al 2018. The Rosetta mission was launched in 2004, the problem was encountered in 2014, but surprisingly, the same problem occurred again during the InSight HP3 seismic experiment, launched in 2018, when the seismometer SEIS was listening for seismic waves produced by the hammer of the HP 3 heat flow probe (Spohn, Hudson, et al 2021;Sollberger, Schmelzbach, Andersson, et al 2020). The lack of a joint time signal between the two instruments HP 3 and SEIS meant that a convoluted process was necessary to infer the exact time of each hammer blow from the seismic signal itself, significantly increasing the uncertainty of the observation.…”
Section: Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%