Gossip 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-6112-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inside Scoop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
1
8

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
53
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, gossip facilitates critical thinking as a social sense-making tool (Bok, 1982), and gossip includes positive information and delivers a more accurate experiential truth than objective explanation (Levin & Arluke, 1987). Similarly, gossip is essentially negative and cannot be unveiled in public (Leaper & Holliday, 1995), and gossip has received pejorative criticism with all cultures and societies experiencing similarly scandalous effects of gossip (Rosnow & Georgoudi, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, gossip facilitates critical thinking as a social sense-making tool (Bok, 1982), and gossip includes positive information and delivers a more accurate experiential truth than objective explanation (Levin & Arluke, 1987). Similarly, gossip is essentially negative and cannot be unveiled in public (Leaper & Holliday, 1995), and gossip has received pejorative criticism with all cultures and societies experiencing similarly scandalous effects of gossip (Rosnow & Georgoudi, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gossip facilitates critical thinking as a social sense-making tool (Bok, 1982). Similarly, Levin and Arluke (1987) claim that gossip includes positive information, and that gossip can deliver a more accurate, experiential truth than objective explanations. More specifically, positive gossip facilitates group member cooperation, and that the levels of reciprocity, trust and reputation between individual members are also enhanced (Sommerfeld, Krambeck, & Milinski, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the group level, gossip has been aptly called "a slow scanning of the total informational resource of the group" (Roberts, 1964, p. 441) or "a sort of tally sheet for public opinion" (Szwed, 1966, p. 435). The "official line," in this age of sophisticated and instantaneously informed publics, is often dismissed in favor of "the inside scoop" that only gossip can provide (Ayim, 1994;Crampton, Hodge, & Mishra, 1998;Levin & Arluke, 1987;Rosnow, 2001). Suls (1977) observed that, although it may be possible to communicate directly with other people regarding needed social comparison information, gossip may be the better means to such knowledge if the information sought is of an unfavorable kind.…”
Section: Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency to gossip has been found to correlate, not surprisingly, with extroversion (Litman & Pezzo, 2005) and other-directedness (Levin & Arluke, 1987), as well as anxiety (Jaeger, Skleder, & Rosnow, 1998;Rosnow & Fine, 1976). In a study of adolescent girls, the most popular girls not only gossiped the most, but also gossiped more harshly about others (McDonald, Putallaz, Grimes, Kupersmidt, & Coie, 2007), which is consistent with a conceptualization of gossip as a tool to gain (or maintain) power.…”
Section: Who Gossips To Whom?mentioning
confidence: 99%