Gossip and the Group: A Self-Categorization Perspective

Abstract

of the Dissertation Gossip and theGossip is a little studied topic and even fewer studies have examined gossip from the perspective of social identity and self categorization theories. However, many of the functions of gossip have significant implications for group processes, including bonding, norm transmission and reinforcement, marginalization of deviants, and social influence. Particularly for those on the margins of the group, gossip may be used as a tool to gain acceptance in the group, as gossip is an effective way to express group loyalty and adherence to group norms. Study One investigated the extent to which being a prototypical member of one's group was predictive of likelihood to spread gossip. Using sororities as the group, members were presented with a hypothetical piece of gossip and asked the extent to which the member who gossiped is peripheral, how likely they would be to share the gossip with other group members, and how prototypical they perceive themselves to be of the sorority. It was predicted that peripheral group members would be more likely to spread gossip than other group members, particularly about other peripheral group members, and particularly when the information was not highly negative. Study Two was conducted in parallel, using the same methodology, but with a piece of gossip about a celebrity instead of a fellow sorority member. It was predicted that the results would mirror those of Study One and that peripheral members would be most likely to spread the gossip. While none of the stated hypotheses were supported, there were several unanticipated interactions. In both StudyOne and Study Two, there was a significant three-way interaction, in that a highly uncertain respondent, a prototypical target, and relatively mild negative gossip was associated with anticipated transmission to the highest number of sorority members. While the results were unanticipated, they are not inexplicable and the implications for research in the areas of gossip, celebrity, and self categorization theory are discussed.

‘Shh … quiet! Here they come.’ Black employees as targets of office gossip

“…Unlike the findings of other studies that employees who belonged to minority groups and were the targets of gossip left the organisation (Keiffer, 2013;Kniffen, & Wilson, 2010;Turcotte, 2012), it was found in the current study that the black employees supported each other to counteract the detrimental effects of negative gossip and to cushion them to an extent because they did not receive support from management. This finding contradicted the finding Running head: Racialising gossip 13 of Shallcross et al (2011) that a lack of support from management resulted in the targets of gossip leaving the organisation.…”

Social capital levels, gossip and employee performance in aviation and shipping companies in Israel

“…In organizations, gossip is an integral part of the workplace, bridging the gap for many employees between knowing and not knowing (Turcotte, 2012). A common point of view states that organizational gossip is negative by its very nature (Wu, Kwan, Wu and Ma, 2018).…”

Okul Yöneticilerinin Dedikodu ve Dedikodu Yönetimine İlişkin Görüşleri

“…Dedikodu ve söylentiler, aynı düzeydeki çalışanların ortak karar almalarını sağlar (Aydın, 2007, s.40). Dedikodu hem diğer üyelerle bağ kurmanın, grup sadakatinin sergilenmesi hem de gruba dahil olma oranını arttırmanın ideal bir yoludur (Turcotte, 2012;Granecki, 2014).…”