The Innovative Performance of China's National Innovation System

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may AbstractThe objective of this paper is to investigate the innovative performance of China's NIS in international comparison and the capacity of China's NIS in creating indigenous innovation. We provide insights drawing upon patent data and using patent families to determine the value of the underlying invention. For the timeframe we studied, China's comparative advantage exists in the creation of low value innovative performance, albeit increasingly in huge quantities. Constantly rising volumes of patent applications mirror both, the improved protection of intellectual property rights and increasing capacity for inventiveness. Supplemented by the continuous growth of the Chinese economy, improving conditions are reflected and reinforced by more R&D-intense FDI. Foreign firms' innovative performance associated with higher economic value is particularly strong..

Market integration and green economic growth—recent evidence of China’s city-level data from 2004–2018

“…As study from Lin et al (2011) emphasizes, China is characterized with remarkable regional imbalance which underlines a regional institutional environment rather than production networks or others. However, the market in China is not adequate to solve most allocation problems and institutional components are expected to play bigger role (Boeing & Sandner 2011). Therefore, it is worth noting institutional components such as legal and extralegal formal institutions such as patent and tax laws that regulate and coordinate interactions, government policy and specific institutions such as industrial policies, environmental and safety regulations that direct the innovation process, norms and routines that influence the nature and extent of innovative efforts (Buckow 2013).…”

Challenges to the Promotion of Employee-Driven Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises: Two Cases from the Automotive Sector in China

“…Although China has transformed itself to a more marketized economy since the late 1980s, the central and local governments are still strongly intervening in the economy because they still own a high number of large companies in mid-tech, mid-high-tech, and high-tech industries [54]. SOEs in China dominate most of important sectors which the Chinese government have classified into two main groups, namely the "Strategic and Key Industries" and the "Basic and Pillar Industries" [47] (p. 343).…”

Implications of China’s on-going dependence on foreign technology

“…Although many economists have argued that at its current level of development, there was greater potential for China to benefit from spillovers created by foreign multinational companies in China, others have found limited benefits from such as spillovers and suggest that innovation from both indigenous and foreign sources was complementary and necessary (Boeing and Sandner, 2011;Xu and Sheng, 2011;Fu and Gong, 2010). An important aspect of the new indigenous innovation policy involves developing the capacity among Chinese companies to absorb foreign technology and to optimise its exploitation for the local market.…”