2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The information content of short-term options

Abstract: We exploit weekly options on the S&P 500 index to compute the weekly implied variance. We show that the weekly implied variance is a strong predictor of the weekly realized variance. In an encompassing regression test, it crowds out the information content of the monthly implied variance. Further tests reveal that the weekly implied variance outperforms not only the monthly implied variance but also well-established time series models of realized variance. This result holds both in-and out-of-sample and the fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the early studies of Latane and Rendleman (1976) and Chiras and Manaster (1978) on the superior predictive power of option-implied standard deviations for future volatility forecasting, Day and Lewis (1992) and Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1993) questioned their overperformance compared to historical time series models, elucidating that implied volatilities are biased and inefficient predictors with poor contribution in volatility forecasting accuracy partly due to misspecification errors. In marked contrast, the vast majority of the subsequent studies (see, for example, Blair et al, 2001;Busch et al, 2011;Christensen & Prabhala, 1998;Frijns et al, 2010;Kambouroudis et al, 2016;Martens & Zein, 2004;Oikonomou et al, 2019) alongside the improvement in implied volatility extraction techniques from option prices (Carr & Wu, 2006;Fleming, 1998;Jiang & Tian, 2005) confirm that the variability implicit in options, interpreted as an ex-ante volatility market forecast, is a substantially better predictor with incremental information value for future volatility beyond that captured by squared returns or realized variance.…”
Section: The Aim-heavy Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the early studies of Latane and Rendleman (1976) and Chiras and Manaster (1978) on the superior predictive power of option-implied standard deviations for future volatility forecasting, Day and Lewis (1992) and Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1993) questioned their overperformance compared to historical time series models, elucidating that implied volatilities are biased and inefficient predictors with poor contribution in volatility forecasting accuracy partly due to misspecification errors. In marked contrast, the vast majority of the subsequent studies (see, for example, Blair et al, 2001;Busch et al, 2011;Christensen & Prabhala, 1998;Frijns et al, 2010;Kambouroudis et al, 2016;Martens & Zein, 2004;Oikonomou et al, 2019) alongside the improvement in implied volatility extraction techniques from option prices (Carr & Wu, 2006;Fleming, 1998;Jiang & Tian, 2005) confirm that the variability implicit in options, interpreted as an ex-ante volatility market forecast, is a substantially better predictor with incremental information value for future volatility beyond that captured by squared returns or realized variance.…”
Section: The Aim-heavy Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an extension to this research stream, one might be interested in examining the impact of shorter‐dated options such as weeklies, which are becoming popular across the exchanges, on the spot volatility. Oikonomou et al (2019) exploited the information content of weeklies and find that the implied variance of these options is a better predictor of the future weekly realized variance than not only monthly implied variance but also well‐established time‐series models of realized variance. Andersen et al (2017) use the deep OTM weekly options as an indicator of a risk‐neutral jump process and ATM options as a reflection of current spot volatility.…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These prior studies were unable to study weekly options because their sample periods all ended prior to a significant number of firms having weekly options. Prior research on weekly options largely focuses on indices rather than individual stocks (e.g., Andersen et al 2017;Oikonomou et al 2019;Jain and Kotha 2022). The few studies that examine weekly options on individual stocks do not examine earnings announcements or straddle returns (e.g., Wen 2020;Bryzgalova et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%