Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review

Abstract: The detrimental effects of academic distraction have become increasingly problematic in recent years due to student media multitasking. In recent years, educators have gradually transitioned many classes to the online learning environment, effectively reducing teacher supervision. This has been greatly exacerbated with the advent of coronavirus disease 2019 and subsequent social distancing guidelines. In an effort to help students and educators better understand the implications of technology on academic distr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This had pedagogical/psychological consequences in students' life and families' organization, due to the need of adequate technological skills, new learning strategies, as well as availability of digital devices and fast connectivity [20,21]. Online learning led to an increase of the screen time, resulting in turn to a greater possibility of students' distraction by social media or games [22]. Furthermore, increased digitalization widened the "educational gap" among families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This had pedagogical/psychological consequences in students' life and families' organization, due to the need of adequate technological skills, new learning strategies, as well as availability of digital devices and fast connectivity [20,21]. Online learning led to an increase of the screen time, resulting in turn to a greater possibility of students' distraction by social media or games [22]. Furthermore, increased digitalization widened the "educational gap" among families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FoMO is defined as "a pervasive apprehension that others might be having rewarding experiences from which one is absent" (Przybylski et al, 2013(Przybylski et al, , p. 1841. The resulting urge to constantly check online contents and the incoming notifications have negative consequences on adolescents' cognitive development and academic achievement (Dontre, 2020), also because online checking behaviors distract during study time, interfere with ongoing activities, and limit cognitive processing capacities (van der Schuur et al, 2015;Camerini and Marciano, 2020). Furthermore, the prolonged use of screens, especially during night hours, was found to be associated with later onset of sleep and reduced sleep quality (Hale and Guan, 2015;Carter et al, 2016), which, in turn, have negative consequences on the brain functioning (Telzer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Screen Time In Adolescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing evidence suggests that smartphone use triggers frequent interruptions and breaks from main tasks, further interfering with cognitive processes and ability (20)(21)(22)(23)(24), cognitive functioning (25)(26)(27)(28), and associated with distraction and compromised performance (26)(27)(28) resulting in sub-optimal learning among young people (29,30). Disruption from smartphone use is even more prominent within classroom environments (31)(32)(33), hindering academic achievement due to interference with primary tasks (12,34) and in less engaging academic contexts, prompting lower motivational levels and comprehension (12,35,36), task performance (37), and chronic media multitasking (12). Smartphone interruptive notifications are frequent external triggers (38) which disrupt daily activities and have even been associated with mood disorders mediated by boredom proneness (39).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%