2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Dimensions of Smartphone Distraction: Development, Validation, Measurement Invariance, and Latent Mean Differences of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS)

Abstract: Background: Distraction is a functional emotion regulation strategy utilized to relieve emotional distress. Within the attention economy perspective, distraction is increasingly associated with digital technology use, performance impairments and interference with higher-order cognitive processes. Research on smartphone distraction and its association with problematic smartphone use is still scarce and there is no available psychometric assessment tool to assess this cognitive and emotive process parsimoniously… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
(358 reference statements)
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, if the heterogeneity of the person-specific associations between SMU and distraction is stable, the heterogeneity may be explained by factors that are also relatively stable over time. In this case, trait-like characteristics, such as gender (Throuvala et al, 2021), trait levels of fear of missing out (Franchina, Vanden Abeele, van Rooij, Lo Coco, & De Marez, 2018), parental control (Fardouly, Magson, Johnco, Oar, & Rapee, 2018), or proactive self-control strategies (Brevers & Turel, 2019) are likely to moderate the effects of social media use on distraction. Conversely, if the heterogeneity appears to be unstable across time, it is more likely that the heterogeneity in person-specific associations is explained by situational factors, such as mindfulness (Chin et al, 2020), exhaustion (Reinecke & Hofmann, 2016), sleep quality (Baumeister, Wright, & Carreon, 2019;Roca et al, 2012), or other factors that may fluctuate across different weeks, months, or years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, if the heterogeneity of the person-specific associations between SMU and distraction is stable, the heterogeneity may be explained by factors that are also relatively stable over time. In this case, trait-like characteristics, such as gender (Throuvala et al, 2021), trait levels of fear of missing out (Franchina, Vanden Abeele, van Rooij, Lo Coco, & De Marez, 2018), parental control (Fardouly, Magson, Johnco, Oar, & Rapee, 2018), or proactive self-control strategies (Brevers & Turel, 2019) are likely to moderate the effects of social media use on distraction. Conversely, if the heterogeneity appears to be unstable across time, it is more likely that the heterogeneity in person-specific associations is explained by situational factors, such as mindfulness (Chin et al, 2020), exhaustion (Reinecke & Hofmann, 2016), sleep quality (Baumeister, Wright, & Carreon, 2019;Roca et al, 2012), or other factors that may fluctuate across different weeks, months, or years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsequent study by supported the role of positive metacognitions about the usefulness of smartphone to control emotion and cognition and to help in socializing, and negative metacognitions about uncontrollability and cognitive harm of smartphone use in predicting PSU beyond anxiety and depression. Recently, Throuvala et al (2021) highlighted moderate correlations between smartphone distraction (i.e., the use of the smartphone as an emotion regulation coping strategy) and both positive and negative metacognitions about the social use of the smartphone (i.e., reflective beliefs related to cognitive and emotional responses to social media use, and the difficulty in controlling social media use, respectively).…”
Section: Metacognitions In Problematic Smartphone Use (Psu)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the metacognitive model of addictive behaviors and previous studies on metacognitions in PSU Casale et al, 2020;Throuvala et al, 2021), we believe that additional research is required that may contribute to our understanding of the relative contribution of metacognitions about smartphone use to PSU.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distraction from devices, a growing area of concern, was a key area in parental narratives consistent with literature [129]. Distractibility has been associated with decreased academic performance, lower enjoyment in social situations, and diminished memory for experiences [130][131][132][133][134][135].…”
Section: Psychoeducation and Upskillingmentioning
confidence: 72%