The influence of technological innovation and human capital on environmental efficiency among different regions in Asia-Pacific

Abstract

This study employs super-efficiency DEA model with desirable inputs and an undesirable output in calculating environmental efficiency values in different regions in Asia-Pacific from 1990 to 2018. The study compares environmental efficiency index in South East Asia, South Asia and East Asia. The study also evaluates the determinants of environmental efficiency using truncated regression. The mean environmental efficiency score demonstrates that East Asia region is highly efficient whereas South East Asia is the least efficient. Results from the truncated regression established an inverted U-shape relationship between environmental efficiency and Technological Innovation (TI) in the main panel, and the three regions. Also, economic growth shows an inverted "U" shape link with environmental efficiency in the panels except in South East Asia. Human capital promotes environmental efficiency in the main panel and the rest of the regions. Moreover, while FDI promotes environmental efficiency in the main panel and East Asia, it reduces environmental efficiency in both South East and South Asia regions within the Asia-Pacific. In addition, an interaction effect between technological innovation and renewable energy use, advances environmental efficiency within the entire study countries. Based on the findings the study proposes several policy recommendations.

Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…Renewable energy is the key to limiting greenhouse gas emissions and limiting the increase in global temperature by 2 • [156]. The continents were also investigated: Asia was studied in [157][158][159], and the African continent in [160]. The most localized studies have a concentration on research focused on China [161][162][163].…”

Towards Ecological Sustainability: Assessing Dynamic Total-Factor Ecology Efficiency in Africa

“…However, after income get to a certain threshold, ecological efficiency improves with further enhancement in income per capita thus, this nexus exhibits a U-shaped curve. Several studies support this hypothesis [11,55]. Moreover, Moutinho et al [56] investigated the effect of income on efficiency using the super-SBM approach and reported that PGDP has a negative impact on environmental efficiency in Germany.…”

“…To test the nexus between growth and DSTFEE in Africa, the study presents the following nonlinear model by following prior such [11,54].…”

“…CO 2 emission as a measure of environmental degradation has been extensively studied, for instance, among the America [7], European countries [8,9], Asian countries [10,11], as well as recently in Africa countries [12][13][14] at either panel or single country level.…”

Environmental Efficiency Assessment of Heavy Pollution Industry by Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index Analysis: Empirical Evidence from China

“…Fukuyama et al (2020) measured Japan's environmental efficiency by the two-stage network production model in their research and studied the relationship between environmental and energy efficiency and Japanese happiness [12]. Twum et al (2021) measured the environmental efficiency values of different regions in the Asia-Pacific region from 1990 to 2018 by super-efficiency DEA model and proved the inverted U-shaped link between environmental efficiency and technological innovation [13]. conducted a study on China's regional industries from 2011 to 2015, regarding SO 2 and solid waste emissions as undesirable output [14].…”