“…Thirty-five comparative studies have used multi-outcome measures of client change, and 27 studies have collected follow-up data on at least one measure. Representative outcome criteria have included performance on standardized psychological tests and various psychometric instruments (Lick & Heffler, 1977;Schortinghuis & Frohman, 1974), clients' selfreported change and satisfaction with services (Getz et al, 1975;Lamb & Clack, 1974), clinical ratings offered by independent judges (O'Brien, Hamm, Ray, Pierce, Luborsky, & Mintz, 1972), information from significant others (Miles, McLean, & Maurice, 1976;Wolff, 1969), academic or work performance (Mosher, Menn, & Matthews, 1975;Zunker & Brown, 1966), behavior ratings (Appleby, 1963;Ellsworth, 1968), analysis of therapistoffered empathy, warmth, and genuineness (Knickerbocker & McGee, 1973;Truax, 1967), performance in role-playing or in vivo situations (Fremouw & Harmatz, 1975;Moleski & Tosi, 1976), therapist improvement ratings (Karlsruher, 1976), supervisor evaluations (Covner, 1969;Magoon & Golann, 1966), criteria specific to treatment goals, Note. A indicates that the design criteria were mainly satisfied; B, that one or two criteria were deficient; C, that three or four were deficient; D, that five were deficient; and E, that deficiencies were present in more than five criteria.…”