2016
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of subcutaneous fat on the relationship between body composition and ultrasound-derived muscle quality

Abstract: Ultrasound echo intensity (EI) values are a popular assessment of muscle quality. The relationship between EI and total (%fat) and regional (%fat) body composition was examined in 40 men, prior to and after accounting for subcutaneous fat thickness. Uncorrected EI values suggest that muscle quality improves (r = -0.329 to -0.224; P = 0.038-0.165) with greater %fat and %fat. However, corrected EI values indicated that muscle quality decreases (r = 0.711 to 0.798; P < 0.001) with greater %fat and %fat.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We treated the BR stage, age, body weight, serum albumin level, mean blood pressure, and number of medications as covariates based on bivariate regression analyses. We also treated subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and time since stroke as covariates because these factors are associated with MT and EI [2,32]. All tests were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We treated the BR stage, age, body weight, serum albumin level, mean blood pressure, and number of medications as covariates based on bivariate regression analyses. We also treated subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and time since stroke as covariates because these factors are associated with MT and EI [2,32]. All tests were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although work in both humans and animals suggest that echo intensity may reflect intramuscular adiposity and fibrous tissue content (Reimers et al, 1993;Pillen et al, 2009;Young et al, 2015;Ryan et al, 2016), the exact explanation for what it represents is somewhat unclear (Jenkins, 2016). Although work in both humans and animals suggest that echo intensity may reflect intramuscular adiposity and fibrous tissue content (Reimers et al, 1993;Pillen et al, 2009;Young et al, 2015;Ryan et al, 2016), the exact explanation for what it represents is somewhat unclear (Jenkins, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echo intensity is becoming an increasingly common dependent variable in anatomy, physiology and physical activity studies. Although work in both humans and animals suggest that echo intensity may reflect intramuscular adiposity and fibrous tissue content (Reimers et al, 1993;Pillen et al, 2009;Young et al, 2015;Ryan et al, 2016), the exact explanation for what it represents is somewhat unclear (Jenkins, 2016). Recently, Young et al (2015) used MRI to create sex-specific equations for converting echo intensity and subcutaneous fat values to the percent of intramuscular fat for the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously described, SFT is defined as the perpendicular distance between the inferior border of the epithelium and the superior border of the superficial aponeurosis [40]. Quantification of SFT was determined as the average SFT adjacent to the lateral, mid-line, and medial portions of the VL using the line tool in ImageJ and is reported in centimeters [40,41]. The average SFT of the three images taken in each rest position was then used for further analysis.…”
Section: Ultrasound Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%