2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: A systematic review

Abstract: Sagittal pelvic kinematics along with spino-pelvic angular parameters have recently been studied by numerous investigators for their effect on total hip replacement (THR) clinical outcomes, but many issue of spine-hip relations (SHR) are currently unexplored. Therefore, our review aims at clarifying the following questions: is there any evidence of a relationship between articular impingement/dislocation risk in primary THR and (1) certain sagittal pelvic kinematics patterns, (2) pelvic incidence, and (3) type… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
113
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(132 reference statements)
4
113
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…only 11% were unbalanced after the surgery. No significant variation of the SS as the SSA was associated to this restoration, in concordance with the lack of variation reported by others [16]. They had shown improvement of the sagittal balance in unbalanced preoperative population of patient after L5-S1 TDR, in particular in case of unbalanced patients with low SS values (Roussouly type 1 and 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…only 11% were unbalanced after the surgery. No significant variation of the SS as the SSA was associated to this restoration, in concordance with the lack of variation reported by others [16]. They had shown improvement of the sagittal balance in unbalanced preoperative population of patient after L5-S1 TDR, in particular in case of unbalanced patients with low SS values (Roussouly type 1 and 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…It has been considered for several decades that the cup should be oriented within a safe zone defined as 15° ± 10° of anteversion and 40° ± 10° of inclination according to the anterior pelvic plane (APP) . Some authors mentioned that this safe zone is not suitable because of the extreme interindividual variation of the pelvic kinematics . During daily activities such as in the sitting, standing, and supine positions, the pelvic tilt varies substantially to modify the functional orientation of the acetabulum and to adjust the range of motion of the hip according to these different positions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Some authors mentioned that this safe zone is not suitable because of the extreme interindividual variation of the pelvic kinematics. [9][10][11][12] During daily activities such as in the sitting, standing, and supine positions, the pelvic tilt varies substantially to modify the functional orientation of the acetabulum and to adjust the range of motion of the hip according to these different positions. When the pelvis posteriorly tilts, as, for instance, in the sitting position, the acetabular anteversion is increased to enable higher flexion but reducing extension at the same time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic review by Riviere et al . includes 12 articles, which has demonstrated that high pelvic mobility is a risk factor for the sign of prosthetic impingement and dislocation after THA. Nonetheless, the high pelvic mobility causes an increase in acetabular anteversion from the supine position to the standing or sitting position.…”
Section: Significance Of Sagittal Spinopelvic Tilt In the Preoperativmentioning
confidence: 99%