The concept of the “safe area” of the acetabular prosthesis has a long history and has been recognized by many scholars. It is generally believed that postoperative hip dislocation rate is low, when the acetabular anteversion angle is placed in the range of 15° ± 10°. Despite this, hip dislocation is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty. In recent years, more and more scholars have paid attention to the influence of pelvic tilt on the acetabular anteversion angle. The concept of acetabular anteversion changes as the pelvic tilt changes, and is challenging the traditional acetabular prosthesis “safe area.” This study summarized the potential influencing factors of pelvic tilt and discussed the influence of the phenomenon on the anteversion angle of total hip arthroplasty (THA) acetabular prosthesis based on the literature review. We conclude that from the supine position to standing, followed by sitting, the pelvis tends to move backward. Pelvic sagittal activity, lumbar disease (ankylosing spondylitis), lumbar fusion (lumbar fusion, spine‐pelvic fusion), and other factors related to the tilt are THA risk factors for postoperative dislocation and revision. With the change of body position, the degree of acetabular anteversion is directly related to the degree of pelvic tilt. The acetabular anteversion varies greatly, which leads to increased hip prosthesis wear and even hip dislocation. The lateral X‐ray of the spine and pelvis is recommended in supine, standing, and sitting positions before THA. In addition, the pelvic tilt should be regarded as a reference of the acetabular prosthesis in the preoperative planning of THA.
ObjectiveTo explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions.MethodsA prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was conducted. AP pelvic radiographs were taken in supine and standing positions before surgery The pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters from the two radiographs were compared. Contrast parameters included the distance between the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC), lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and angle of sharp (SA).ResultsA total of 110 young DDH patients were enrolled, including 32 men and 78 women, aged 18–49 years. The male PSSC was 45.63 ± 13.69 mm in supine position and 36.91 ± 12.33 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). The female PSSC was 56.76 ± 13.54 mm in supine position and 48.62 ± 15.44 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). In this study, LCEA <20° in AP pelvic radiographs in the supine position was found in 52 men and 135 women. For male patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 5.51° ± 11.88° and 4.45° ± 12.22°, respectively (P < 0.05); TA were 20.20° ± 9.63° and 21.30° ± 9.97°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA comparison showed no significant differences. For female patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 3.07° ± 12.07° and 1.69° ± 12.11°, respectively (P < 0.05), TA were 22.62° ± 9.31° and 23.82° ± 9.45°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA were 48.01° ± 4.68° and 48.49° ± 4.74°, respectively (P < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with the supine position, the young DDH patients have pelvic tilt backward and a decrease in hip coverage in the standing position.
This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate whether knee extensor (KE) strength weakness was associated with increased structural worsening in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) including joint space narrowing (JSN) and cartilage loss. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched from their inception to May 2020, to identify eligible studies. Odds ratios (ORs) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the relationship between KE strength and outcomes. Totally eleven longitudinal studies were included. The pooled crude OR indicated no significant association between KE strength weakness and KOA progression of JSN (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.42), and this result duplicated after confounders were adjusted (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.39). Subgroup analysis showed the association remained non-significant in sex-specific outcomes and subsets of neutral and malaligned knees, but there was a trend toward increased risk of JSN progression in female knees with low strength (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.76, I 2 = 82%). The pooled crude OR showed that KE strength weakness was associated with increased risk of cartilage loss (OR:1.43, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.95). After adjustment, we found a non-significant trend that low KE strength could increase the risk of cartilage loss (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.64), and this trend was separately observed in tibiofemoral or patellofemoral compartments. This meta-analysis suggested that KE strength weakness was not significantly associated with an increased risk of radiographic structural KOA progression in patients with KOA or known risk factors for KOA. However, there was a trend that women with weaker KE strength displayed a higher risk of JSN worsening and that KE strength weakness had an association with an increased risk of cartilage damage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.