1996
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(96)84737-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of sperm-oocyte incubation time and breed of bull on in vitro embryo development in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relationship between the bull breed and the kinetics of acrosome changes in bovine spermatozoa was described by Sumantri et al (1996) and Demyda-Peyras et al (2012). In addition to that, our study confirms that individual bulls within a breed exhibit characteristic kinetics of acrosome changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A relationship between the bull breed and the kinetics of acrosome changes in bovine spermatozoa was described by Sumantri et al (1996) and Demyda-Peyras et al (2012). In addition to that, our study confirms that individual bulls within a breed exhibit characteristic kinetics of acrosome changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In order to induce the acrosome reaction, culture media for in vitro fertilisation are supplemented with different capacitating agents, preferentially with heparin, which has a capacitating effect on bovine spermatozoa (Van Soom and de Kruif 1996;Pereira et al 2000;Mendes et al 2003). Sumantri et al (1996) demonstrated that under uniform capacitation conditions, the proportion of sperm capacitated at the same time is highly variable depending on the bull breed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shorter co‐incubation times can lead to higher oocyte fertilization (Gianaroli et al. 1996a,b) and blastocysts rates (Sumantri et al. 1996; Kochhar and King 1998; Grupen and Nottle 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed a negative effect of prolonged coincubation times during fertilization, probably because of production of reactive oxygen species by the spermatozoa (Gianaroli et al 1996b;Dirnfeld et al 1999) leading to detrimental embryonic development (Baker and Aitken 2004). Shorter co-incubation times can lead to higher oocyte fertilization (Gianaroli et al 1996a,b) and blastocysts rates (Sumantri et al 1996;Kochhar and King 1998;Grupen and Nottle 2000).…”
Section: Effects Of Co-incubation Time On Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear, taking into account the available evidence, that male variability in IVF is a general feature of farm animal. Male variation in fertilization rates may possibly be due to differences in breed (Sumantri et al, 1996), season, age of animal, ejaculate sperm quality and other factors. Also it may be attributed to differences in metabolic characteristics of sperm cells (Brackett and Oliphant, 1975), seminal plasma content, the ratios of seminal plasma volume to sperm number (Fukui et al, 1988) and even within lots of semen from the same bull (Otoi et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%