2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of solid retention time on IFAS-MBR systems: Assessment of nitrous oxide emission

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe aim of the present study was to investigate the nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from a moving bed based Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) -membrane bioreactor (MBR) pilot plant, designed according to the University of Cape Town (UCT) layout. The experimental campaign had a duration of 110 days and was characterized by three different sludge retention time (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can avoid the high N2O emissions in suspended growth systems transitioning from anoxic to aerobic zones (Chandran et al 2011). Recent research on N2O emissions from MBBRs are consistent with the factors described at the beginning of this section, depending on the application (Mannina et al 2018a;Mannina et al 2017;Mannina et al 2018b;Wei et al 2017).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This can avoid the high N2O emissions in suspended growth systems transitioning from anoxic to aerobic zones (Chandran et al 2011). Recent research on N2O emissions from MBBRs are consistent with the factors described at the beginning of this section, depending on the application (Mannina et al 2018a;Mannina et al 2017;Mannina et al 2018b;Wei et al 2017).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The IFAS-MBR provides advanced treatment and high-quality effluent but requires a higher capital investment. Careful consideration of these performance aspects is essential in choosing the optimal process for a specific wastewater treatment application [ 55 , 131 ].…”
Section: Comparison Of Asp Ifas and Ifas-mbrmentioning
confidence: 99%