2005
DOI: 10.1080/14759390500200192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of social-demographic determinants on secondary school children's computer use, experience, beliefs and competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although students' background variables have been studied extensively in the context of educational technology, the evidence provided from these studies does not draw a clear picture about the actual effects of these variables. For instance, although Tondeur et al (2010) identified significant relations between students' socioeconomic background and computer use, Van Braak and Kavadias (2005) could not. This diversity of research findings may be due to the differences in ICT access across the samples under investigation (Livingstone & Helsper, 2007).…”
Section: The Role Of Students' Background and Motivation In The Use Omentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although students' background variables have been studied extensively in the context of educational technology, the evidence provided from these studies does not draw a clear picture about the actual effects of these variables. For instance, although Tondeur et al (2010) identified significant relations between students' socioeconomic background and computer use, Van Braak and Kavadias (2005) could not. This diversity of research findings may be due to the differences in ICT access across the samples under investigation (Livingstone & Helsper, 2007).…”
Section: The Role Of Students' Background and Motivation In The Use Omentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Research on students' use of information and communication technology (ICT) has examined its effects on educational outcomes, well-being, and health (Cotten, 2008;Cox & Marshall, 2007); OECD (2015b); (Spiezia, 2010). In a parallel, yet almost distinct line of research, the antecedents and institutional determinants of ICT use were studied at different levels of educational systems (Bozionelos, 2004;Fraillon, Ainley, Schulz, Friedman, & Gebhardt, 2014;Teo & Noyes, 2011;Van Braak & Kavadias, 2005). These research traditions have revealed findings on the relations between the use of ICT and academic achievement, and have pointed to the importance of students' background and cultural capital for exploiting the available technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some results are obviously not consistent with the conventional view of the digital divide and there are also many discrepant interpretations of what the results indicate (see Hacker and Mason, 2003). The study by van Braak and Kavadias (2005), for instance, suggests that socioeconomic background explains material differences between young people, but does not affect ICT competence. This finding matches the conclusion of van Dijk and that the current digital divide is a very complex and dynamic phenomenon.…”
Section: Empirical Studies On Ict As Cultural Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it has been argued that there are gaps in terms of age and SES (Wilson, Wallin and Reiser 2003). However, there is a growing body of literature focusing on the relationship between childhood SES and the internet literacy of children and young people (Cho et al 2003; Livingstone and Helsper 2007; van Braak and Kavadias 2005). Yet there still remains a gap in our understanding of the relationship between indicators of SES at different phases in the lifecourse and internet use in older adulthood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%