2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of sensory and packaging cues on both liking and emotional, abstract and functional conceptualisations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
65
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results on the discriminative ability of food-elicited emotions replicate the findings by Ng et al (2013b), where food-evoked emotions differentiated successfully between product evaluations based on different elements (taste -packaging). Relatedly, it has been reported that emotional responses to the same food stimuli (image of a chocolate brownie) differed when evaluated under several conceived consumption contexts (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results on the discriminative ability of food-elicited emotions replicate the findings by Ng et al (2013b), where food-evoked emotions differentiated successfully between product evaluations based on different elements (taste -packaging). Relatedly, it has been reported that emotional responses to the same food stimuli (image of a chocolate brownie) differed when evaluated under several conceived consumption contexts (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, type of emotional response may differ across blind and package conditions due to a mismatch between the expected performance (based on package), and actual food product performance. This was reported in two recent studies where different emotional profiles were found across blind, package and informed (package and taste) conditions for different commercial blackcurrant squashes (Ng et al, 2013b;Spinelli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results of sensory acceptance tests are traditionally analyzed by examining the frequency distribution of hedonic ratings obtained for each sample or by means of analysis of variance (REIS;MINIM, 2010;VARELA et al, 2010;VASCONCELOS et al, 2013;NG;CHAYA;HORT, 2013). Another way to analyze this type of data is using multivariate internal preference maps (MDPREF) of the samples (MACFIE; THOMSON, 1988;SALES et al, 2008;REIS et al, 2010;SILVA et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%