2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-019-09508-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Scope, Frames, and Extreme Willingness to Pay Responses on Cost of Crime Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this study provides the first estimate in the United States for how much people are willing to pay to improve the brightness of street lighting with the goal of improving public safety. While other research evaluates people's willingness to pay to reduce crime broadly, such studies typically ask survey respondents about unnamed programs that would reduce crime by a certain amount (Ludwig and Cook 2001;Cohen et al 2004;Loomes 2007;Bishop and Murphy 2011;Cohen 2015;Stickle 2015;Baker et al 2016;Brenig and Proeger 2018;Piquero and Steinberg 2010;Lee and Fisher 2020). 15 Perhaps surprisingly the approach has rarely been used in the CPTED literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this study provides the first estimate in the United States for how much people are willing to pay to improve the brightness of street lighting with the goal of improving public safety. While other research evaluates people's willingness to pay to reduce crime broadly, such studies typically ask survey respondents about unnamed programs that would reduce crime by a certain amount (Ludwig and Cook 2001;Cohen et al 2004;Loomes 2007;Bishop and Murphy 2011;Cohen 2015;Stickle 2015;Baker et al 2016;Brenig and Proeger 2018;Piquero and Steinberg 2010;Lee and Fisher 2020). 15 Perhaps surprisingly the approach has rarely been used in the CPTED literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study shows dual estimations of the public crime cost in currency terms by two approaches, one of based on bottom-up official accounting and another derived from topdown willingness-to-pay. Such dual estimations essentially cover the popular and feasible ways of crime cost estimation (Lee et al 2019;Osterman et al 2016). Generally, bottomup estimation sums up cost components to obtain the total cost, whereas top-down estimation estimates the total cost directly.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the interviewer continued to quote a higher or lower amount until the respondent denied any increment or decrement. This procedure would optimize the accuracy of open-ended estimation by urging the respondent's deliberation (Lee et al 2019). Eventually, the crime cost was the sum of expenses on three crime cost components, rehabilitation, criminal justice and prevention.…”
Section: Survey Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Heeks et al, 2018). Second, criminal activity is associated to social costs that affect welfare gains and economic performance for the whole society (Lee & Fisher, 2020). These social costs are related to the more productive use of the resources employed to prevent criminal activity (e.g., the police, prisons, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%