1997
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.1997.9522905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of reproductive season stage on nest defence by meadow pipits (Anthus pratensis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Redondo (1989) predicts that second or subsequent broods should be defended more intensively than the first, because the chance of starting a new brood in the current breeding season decreases. However, there is little clear evidence of the influence of renesting potential on nest defence in birds (see, e.g., Halupka and Halupka 1997;Sergio and Bogliani 2001;Tryjanowski and Golawski 2004). The effects of renesting potential are often concealed by a number of confounding factors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Redondo (1989) predicts that second or subsequent broods should be defended more intensively than the first, because the chance of starting a new brood in the current breeding season decreases. However, there is little clear evidence of the influence of renesting potential on nest defence in birds (see, e.g., Halupka and Halupka 1997;Sergio and Bogliani 2001;Tryjanowski and Golawski 2004). The effects of renesting potential are often concealed by a number of confounding factors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here, the presented experimental tests showed that differences in mobbing behaviour between the birds were not dependent on the number and age of offspring. Recent studies indicate that age and personality of birds are the most important factors influencing the involvement and intensity of brood defence against predators (Halupka and Halupka 1997;Stenhouse et al 2005;Hollander et al 2008;Kryštofková et al 2011). Unfortunately, in these studies the experience and personality of individuals were not investigated further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the available data suggest that warblers and shrikes have similar lifespans (http://www.euring.org), and this factor is unlikely to have a significant impact on the observed pattern. The more possible explanation of asymmetry in antipredatory behaviours between warblers and shrikes may be due to interspecific differences in the possibility to repeat a lost brood during one breeding period (Halupka and Halupka 1997;Hogstad 2005;Klvaňová et al 2011). Both species are long-distance and intercontinental migrants who spend only a small part of their annual life cycle at the breeding areas (Cramp 1992(Cramp , 1993Tøttrup et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possible explanation is greater intensity of behaviour associated with nest defence (Hałupka and Hałupka 1997;Polak 2013). During the egg incubation stage birds behave more secretively in the neighbourhood of their nests and rarely show signs of alarm towards predators turning up nearby.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Nest Survival Ratementioning
confidence: 99%