“…Examples of this approach are provided by, for example, Picon (1976, 1991), Franklin and Hancock (1980), Lemoine et al (1981), Rottländer (1981, 1989), Buxeda (1999) and Buxeda et al (2001). The dependency on the archaeological hypothesis, however, makes this approach risky—even if the assumption of a common origin is true, the potter might have changed his recipe for the production of the clay paste in the course of time, which would result in different ‘chemical fingerprints’ within the same workshop.…”