2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of pedagogical beliefs on technology acceptance: a structural equation modeling study of pre-service mathematics teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The result showed that TPB has a significant influence on PU and PEU. This result is consistent with the current study results of [ 59 ] and from prior studies [ 48 , 58 ], which reported that the relationship between TPB with PU and PEU is not significant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result showed that TPB has a significant influence on PU and PEU. This result is consistent with the current study results of [ 59 ] and from prior studies [ 48 , 58 ], which reported that the relationship between TPB with PU and PEU is not significant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Both of them have a significant relationship with PU and PEU. This confounding result can be explained in three reasonable ways; The first is that most participant lecturers hold both pedagogical beliefs [ 59 ]. Might be participant lecturers utilise a “blended” pedagogical approach (using traditional and constructivist pedagogical beliefs), allowing them to merge differences between their student-centred beliefs and their teacher-centred practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otro lado, con este test se validan las dimensiones planteadas por Cheng et al ( 2021) y los aportes de Liu et al (2017), Tondeur (2020) y Venkatesh et al (2003). Así, se asume la interrelación de los factores que intervienen en el pensamiento docente respecto de la aceptación y uso de las TIC (Gurer & Akkaya, 2021;Mason & Rich, 2019;Moliner et al, 2021;Oyunge, 2021). Además, permitirá evaluar la efectividad de los programas de capacitación en TIC para docentes en formación y servicio (Rich et al, 2021); puesto que la integración de las TIC está determinada por barreras externas e internas (Cheng et al, 2021;Tondeur, 2020) y se debe tomar en cuenta la cognición de los maestros desde las etapas formativas en una visión constructivista de sus aprendizajes (Borg, 2003;Chong et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…No obstante, Mason y Rich (2019) encontraron una investigación limitada, pero creciente, sobre cómo preparar eficazmente a los profesores para integrar la TIC. Así, con un énfasis cada vez mayor en el desarrollo profesional de la TIC, se requieren instrumentos para medir la eficacia y los factores que afectan la aceptación y uso de las TIC (Gurer & Akkaya, 2021;Oyunge, 2021). Al respecto, hay que considerar que la integración de las TIC es un proceso complejo y determinado por barreras externas (aspectos ambientales como disponibilidad tecnológica, apoyo técnico, financiación) e internas (aspectos personales como creencias sobre la enseñanza y el aprendizaje, las actitudes hacia las TIC, y la apertura al cambio) (Cheng et al, 2021;Tondeur, 2020).…”
Section: Componentes De Las Creencias Docentesunclassified
“…Moreover, Farjon et al (2019) found that teachers' beliefs had a significant effect on intention. Gurer and Akkaya (2021) revealed through a study of 714 pre-service teachers that constructivist pedagogical beliefs (CPB) had a greater effect on intention compared with transmissive pedagogical beliefs. However, Kramarski and Michalsky (2015) found that although pre-service teachers preferred CPB, they had concerns about technology integration (Batane and Ngwako, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%