Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1134/1.1641912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of P+, B+, and N+ ion implantation on the luminescence properties of the SiO2: nc-Si system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the peak position of the emissions at $775 and $900 nm remained unchanged with the annealing time these peaks might have resulted from transitions other than the electron-hole recombination within the nanocrystal. Transitions taking place at the nanocrystal/ SiO 2 interface, which have been discussed in the scientific literatures recently [12,15], might be the source of these emission peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the peak position of the emissions at $775 and $900 nm remained unchanged with the annealing time these peaks might have resulted from transitions other than the electron-hole recombination within the nanocrystal. Transitions taking place at the nanocrystal/ SiO 2 interface, which have been discussed in the scientific literatures recently [12,15], might be the source of these emission peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The peak seen at $600 nm has been attributed to radiative defects such as the nonbridging oxygen hole center [5] or to defects such as clusters or chain of Si [8]. The effect of post-processing such as annealing under hydrogen or doping by B and P have been used to understand the possible emission mechanisms for both red and infrared emissions [7,9,10,15]. However, the location of the centers producing luminescence within the implanted region is not identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of course, this value (2 nm) is no more than the estimate of the diameter from below, because it does not include the contribution to the photoelec tron line from the Si 2+ and Si 3+ ions, which are bound with oxygen and do not come into contact with surface atoms of the silicon nanocrystals. Taking this circum stance into account, the obtained value of the average size of the silicon nanocrystals is quite reasonable, as judged from the published data [8][9][10]21]. A similar analysis of the dimensions for carbon precipitates and silicon carbide nanoinclusions is difficult to perform, because it is necessary to consider a multicomponent system (Si-Si, C-C, Si-C, Si-O, C-OSi) with uncertain relationships between chemical compounds inside the precipitates and on their surface.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Sizes Of Silicon Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Taking into account the obtained data on the distri bution of the chemical composition, it can be argued that, in the layers located on both sides of the layer containing carbon, there occurs the formation of sili con nanoinclusions similar to those synthesized dur ing the high temperature annealing of the films of sil icon dioxide SiO 2 after their implantation with Si + ions [8][9][10]. In addition to the SiO 2 phase, these layers also contain silicon in chemical states of SiO y (y < 2).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Sizes Of Silicon Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation