2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp05475h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of negatively charged silica nanoparticles on the surface properties of anionic surfactants: electrostatic repulsion or the effect of ionic strength?

Abstract: The presence of negatively charged nanoparticles affects the surface activity of anionic surfactants in an aqueous phase. This effect is mainly caused by the change in ionic strength of the system resulted from the addition of nanoparticles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic surface tension of the aqueous system in the presence of NPs (0.25 wt %), CTAB (0.5 CMC), and NPSCs (0.25 wt % NP + 0.5 CMC CTAB) is measured using PAT. Consistent with previous studies, 52,53 our results showed that hydrophilic silica NPs do not change the surface tension of pure water (orange triangles in Figure 3a). However, it is observed that adding the same amount of NPs to a 0.5 CMC CTAB solution increases the surface tension of the mixture significantly (see Figure 3a, blue squares vs purple diamonds).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The dynamic surface tension of the aqueous system in the presence of NPs (0.25 wt %), CTAB (0.5 CMC), and NPSCs (0.25 wt % NP + 0.5 CMC CTAB) is measured using PAT. Consistent with previous studies, 52,53 our results showed that hydrophilic silica NPs do not change the surface tension of pure water (orange triangles in Figure 3a). However, it is observed that adding the same amount of NPs to a 0.5 CMC CTAB solution increases the surface tension of the mixture significantly (see Figure 3a, blue squares vs purple diamonds).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This leads to micellization even at lower concentrations. Another possible reason for the decrease in the CMC is the increase in the ionic strength of the solution in the presence of nanoparticles which could enhance the surfactant micellization [27] . However, when the NPs concentration was raised to 300 ppm, an increment in the CMC value was noted to 2172 ppm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible reason for the decrease in the CMC is the increase in the ionic strength of the solution in the presence of nanoparticles which could enhance the surfactant micellization. [27] However, when the NPs concentration was raised to 300 ppm, an increment in the CMC value was noted to 2172 ppm. The sudden increase in the CMC at higher SCN concentrations could be due to the advent of nanoparticles' agglomeration.…”
Section: Effect Of Scn On Critical Micelle Concentration and Its Vari...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to a decrease in the electrostatic repulsive force between the surfactant molecules, forcing the surfactant to form micelles even at a lower concentration. 47 , 48 The reduction in the CMC of the surfactant could be attributed to an increase in the ionic concentration in the solution in the presence of nanoparticles that would promote the micellization of the surfactant even at a lower concentration. 49 , 50 Similar results were obtained in the present study, and the presence of CSNs would have increased the ionic strength of the surfactant solution; as a result, the micellization of the surfactant appeared even at lower concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%