Surfactant
adsorption is a major problem encountered with the surfactant
polymer flooding. A lot of additives have been used in this regard
to tackle this problem. In the present study, a mixture of a nonionic
and an anionic surfactant was used to investigate its effect on the
various aspects of the surfactant polymer flooding. The effect of
temperature and the nonionic surfactant concentration on the critical
micelle concentration of the anionic surfactant was explored. The
adsorption behavior of the surfactant mixture on the sand particles
was explored by comparing the initial and final concentrations of
the surfactant mixture. The adsorption data were fitted in the different
adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin). The interfacial
property and the rock wetting characteristics of the surfactant mixture
were investigated by measuring the surface tension and contact angle,
respectively. Next, the viscosity of the chemical slug (surfactant
and polymer) was analyzed at different temperatures. The viscosity
results were fitted in the power law model to understand the fluid
flow behavior. Finally, the sand pack flooding experiments were performed
using the chemical slug composed of a surfactant mixture and an industrial-grade
polymer. In all the experiments, the binary surfactant mixture outperforms
the individual surfactants and efficiently reduced the surfactant
adsorption by 63%. Also, the binary surfactant mixture achieved an
ultralow interfacial tension value of 0.0097 mN/m. The chemical slug
composed of the binary surfactant and polymer was able to recover
up to 76% of the total oil.
Surfactant polymer
flooding is one of the most common chemical
enhanced oil recovery techniques, which improves not only the microscopic
displacement of the fluid through the formation of the emulsion but
also the volumetric sweep efficiency of the fluid by altering the
viscosity of the displacing fluid. However, one constraint of surfactant
flooding is the loss of the surfactant by adsorption onto the reservoir
rock surface. Hence, in this study, an attempt has been made to reduce
the adsorption of the surfactant on the rock surface using novel colloidal
silica nanoparticles (CSNs). CSNs were used as an additive to improve
the performance of the conventional surfactant polymer flooding. The
reduction in adsorption was observed in both the presence and absence
of a polymer. The presence of a polymer also reduced the adsorption
of the surfactant. Addition of 25 vol % CSNs effectively reduced the
adsorption of up to 61% in the absence of a polymer, which increased
to 64% upon the introduction of 1000 ppm polymer in the solution at
2500 ppm of the surfactant concentration at 25 °C. The adsorption
of surfactant was also monitored with time, and it was found to be
increasing with respect to time. The adsorption of surfactant increased
from 1.292 mg/g after 0.5 days to 4.179 mg/g after 4 days at 2500
ppm of surfactant concentration at 25 °C. The viscosity, surface
tension, and wettability studies were also conducted on the chemical
slug used for flooding. The addition of CSNs effectively reduced the
surface tension as well as shifted the wettability toward water-wet
at 25 °C. Sand pack flooding experiments were performed at 60
°C to access the potential of CSNs in oil recovery, and it was
found that the addition of 25 vol % CSNs in the conventional surfactant
polymer chemical slug aided in the additional oil recovery up to 5%
as compared to that of the conventional surfactant polymer slug.
In this study, for the first time an effort is made to examine the effect of surfactant hydrophobicity on the synthesis of lanthanideseries nanoparticles inside the core of reverse micelles.Tween...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.