2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
165
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
165
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the oil mist levels on shop floor are quite high; oil mist level of 1-56.5 mg/m 3 , 0.8-50 mg/m 3 and 20-90 mg/m 3 was reported for flood type of cooling in automobile manufacture, manufacture of steel products and automotive plants respectively (Benett and Benett, 1985). Also, the use of coolant fluid costs from 7 to 17% of the total manufacturing cost of work-piece (Weinert et al, 2004) and requires additional time for work-piece/tool/machine cleaning (Dhar et al, 2006a). Moreover, a study conducted by Sutherland et al (2000) reveals that 12-80 times more cutting fluid mist was generated with wet turning, than cast iron dust in dry turning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the oil mist levels on shop floor are quite high; oil mist level of 1-56.5 mg/m 3 , 0.8-50 mg/m 3 and 20-90 mg/m 3 was reported for flood type of cooling in automobile manufacture, manufacture of steel products and automotive plants respectively (Benett and Benett, 1985). Also, the use of coolant fluid costs from 7 to 17% of the total manufacturing cost of work-piece (Weinert et al, 2004) and requires additional time for work-piece/tool/machine cleaning (Dhar et al, 2006a). Moreover, a study conducted by Sutherland et al (2000) reveals that 12-80 times more cutting fluid mist was generated with wet turning, than cast iron dust in dry turning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Regression analysis, the final second order regression model is given by: VB = 0.591 -0.00444×X1 + 0.0178×X2 -0.00340×Vc -3.07×F -0.09318×D + 0.0378×Y1 -0.00444×Y2 + 5.34×F×F + 0.0565×D×D + 0.000031×Vc×Vc (3) where VB = Tool wear rate; Vc = cutting speed; F=feed rate; D= depth of cut; and X1, X2 and Y1,Y2 are the indicator variables of type of machining environment and tool materials respectively.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results indicate that MQL enables substantial reduction in the cutting temperature, tool wear, dimensional inaccuracy depending upon the levels of the cutting speed and feed rate [3]. Furthermore, MQL provides environment friendliness, maintaining neat, clean and dry working area, avoiding inconvenience and health hazards due to heat, smoke, fumes, gases, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, few disadvantages make the MQL-based machining process impractical to be adopted in many industrial production settings. 6 The review of literature has revealed that majority of work on MQL machining has carried out on various grades of hardened alloy steels: AISI-1040, AISI 1045, AISI 1060, AISI-4340, Ni-Cr alloys like Inconel 718, brass and aluminum alloy 6061and titanium etc., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and a few researchers have explored MQL machining potential of stainless steel grades. Leppert 17 investigated surface layer properties of AISI 316L stainless steel when turning under dry and MQL conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%