2004
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2004.832132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Magnetization Pattern on the Rotor Losses of Permanent Magnet High-Speed Machines

Abstract: This paper deals with the comparison of two types of permanent magnet high-speed machines. Specifically, the effect of permanent magnet magnetization pattern on the rotor losses is investigated. On the basis of analytical field analysis and two-dimensional (2-D) finite-element method, this paper predicts the flux harmonics and rotor losses under no-load condition. It is shown that the Halbach magnetization is superior to parallel magnetization in terms of producing rotor losses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the high frequency of the magnetic field alternating in the steel core lamination, iron loss can be significantly high as it is closely related to the power frequency [4]. Particularly, rotor eddy current loss is of great importance as such loss heats the rotor directly [5]. Furthermore, rotor overheating may reduce machine performance and lead to the demagnetization of magnets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high frequency of the magnetic field alternating in the steel core lamination, iron loss can be significantly high as it is closely related to the power frequency [4]. Particularly, rotor eddy current loss is of great importance as such loss heats the rotor directly [5]. Furthermore, rotor overheating may reduce machine performance and lead to the demagnetization of magnets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison is here performed under the point of view of the effect of the selected magnetization technique [10], on the potential transformed electromechanical power and to related energetic aspects [16], [17]. The justification of the attention for the argument is related to the strong differences in the magnetization process between the two solutions, under both technical and economic point of view.…”
Section: Fig 1 -Brushless Motor Under Exammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2-pole rotor structure is preferred in the low-power ultra-high-speed applications due to a lower fundamental frequency which is easier for control and also beneficial to the reduction of stator iron loss and rotor PM eddy-current loss [1]- [4]. On the other hand, the 4-pole rotor is more inclined to be adopted for high-power high-speed applications due to reduced end-winding length and stator copper loss, which are quite advantageous for stator thermal equilibrium in high power application [5]- [8]. However, the relatively high fundamental frequency introduced by higher pole number will inevitably lead to higher rotor PM eddycurrent loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%