The Influence of Location on Productivity: Manufacturing Technology in Rural and Urban Areas

Abstract

Policies to counter the growing discrepancy between economic opportunities in rural and urban areas have focused predominantly on expanding manufacturing in rural areas. Fundamental to the design of these strategies are the relative costs of production and productivity of manufacturing in rural and urban areas. This study aims to develop information that can be used to assess the productivity of manufacturing in rural and urban areas. Production functions are estimated in the meat products and household furniture industries to investigate selected aspects of the effect of rural, small urban, and metropolitan location on productivity. The results show that the effect of location on productivity varies with industry, size, and the timing of the entry of the establishment into the industry. While the analysis is specific to two industries, it suggests that development policies targeting manufacturing can be made more effective by focusing on industries and plants with characteristics that predispose them to the locations being supported. iii Disciplines Agricultural and Resource Economics | Agricultural Economics | Biotechnology | Growth and Development AbstractPolicies to counter the growing discrepancy between economic opportunities in rural and

Public Versus Private Delivery of Municipal Solid Waste Services: The Case of North Carolina

“…Table 4 shows productivity and efficiency gains 19 either with public delivery or private contractors. As this paper uses a cost function approach, a smaller value of residual represents a better TFP level (Bae, 2009; Lichtenberg and Siegel, 1987; Martin, McHugh, and Johnson, 1991). These residuals were obtained from the estimated translog cost function in Model 2 in Table 2.…”

“…To compare the productivity level between public delivery and private contractors, the value of residual in each municipality is employed, because it is the logarithmic deviation of its total factor productivity (TFP) level from the average productivity of all municipalities (Bae, 2009; Lichtenberg and Siegel, 1987; Martin, McHugh, and Johnson, 1991). As this paper employs a cost function approach for empirical estimation, a smaller value of residual represents a better TFP level.…”

Local Fiscal Impacts of Tax Abatements: A Labor Market Approach

“…Other researchers have examined whether a taxing jurisdiction is better off with than without a new industry after accounting for the costs of the incentives (Martin, McHugh, & Johnson, 1993). With respect to the net benefits from business incentive programs at the community level, much of the analysis has focused on the effect of the incentive package on local government's ability to provide public goods (Downs, 1997).…”

Restructuring Appalachian Manufacturing in 1963–1992: The Role of Branch Plants

“…There is a rich body of literature examining various relationships among U.S. industries in terms of wages, productivity, and other business-related characteristics (Doms et al 1997;McGuckin and Pascoe 1988). Studies have also examined interindustry differences in productivity and wages across locations (Bernat 1994;1995;Ciccone and Hall 1996;Gale 1998;Glaeser and Mare 1994;Martin et al 1993). Few studies, however, have used the LRD data to determine the extent to which entry and exit rates of firms differ across locations (see Davis et al 1996 for a brief examination of broad regions' entry and exit rates).…”