2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of lightweight aggregate on the physico-mechanical properties of concrete exposed to freeze–thaw cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPA and PA have porous and weak structure and lower compressive strength than normal aggregate. For this reason, as it can be seen from Figure , the compressive strength of samples decreases while EPA and PA content increases. Compressive strength of the samples with PA and EPA decreases for 0.25, 0.30, and 0.35 w/b ratios at 200 freeze–thaw cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EPA and PA have porous and weak structure and lower compressive strength than normal aggregate. For this reason, as it can be seen from Figure , the compressive strength of samples decreases while EPA and PA content increases. Compressive strength of the samples with PA and EPA decreases for 0.25, 0.30, and 0.35 w/b ratios at 200 freeze–thaw cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Faust, Demirboga and Gul, Turkmen and Kantarci, and Turkmen et al pointed out that compressive strength decreases with decreasing density. The samples containing 10% of PA and EPA have shown best performance to the damage of freeze–thaw cycles.it can be said that 10% of PA and EPA is optimum value . Litvan and Sereda and Kuboyama et al have shown that adding porous aggregates to concrete can improve the resistance of concrete to frost action.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest total open porosity results were obtained for PT, namely about 75%, while PP and PS had total open porosity in the range of 45-47%. Information about the total open porosity are often used as one of the most important factors influencing moisture buffering efficiency of porous building materials whereas materials with higher porosity are widely considered as more prospective materials from this point of view (Polat et al 2010). Table 3 shows the parameters obtained by MIP, where besides the information on the total open porosity, also the cumulative pore volume and average pore size of the plasters are given.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be produced with a dry density range of about 300-2000 kg/m 3 , with a compressive strength in the range of 1 to over 60 MPa. The best method of producing lightweight concrete is by using of lightweight aggregate (LWA) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightweight concrete (LWC) has been extensively used in buildings as wall panels, roof decks, masonry blocks and precast concrete elements [2]. It can be produced with a dry density range of about 300-2000 kg/m 3 , with a compressive strength in the range of 1 to over 60 MPa. The best method of producing lightweight concrete is by using of lightweight aggregate (LWA) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%