1949
DOI: 10.2307/1418278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Isolation on the Learning of Surrounding Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This grouping strategy appeared to be responsible for the condition order effect: The participants that started with the isolation condition carried over this strategy in the control condition, which obscured the isolation effect in that group. This pattern of results has been observed previously by Smith and Stearns (1949) who presented two series of words for serial learning: a control list and one containing a centrally isolated red item. Participants who had started with the isolated list showed an isolation effect for the control list-that is, enhanced performance for the control item presented in the serial position in which the isolate had been presented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This grouping strategy appeared to be responsible for the condition order effect: The participants that started with the isolation condition carried over this strategy in the control condition, which obscured the isolation effect in that group. This pattern of results has been observed previously by Smith and Stearns (1949) who presented two series of words for serial learning: a control list and one containing a centrally isolated red item. Participants who had started with the isolated list showed an isolation effect for the control list-that is, enhanced performance for the control item presented in the serial position in which the isolate had been presented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In some cases, the precise instructions given to the participants are not specified in the experimental report (see, e.g., the early study by Smith & Stearns, 1949). However, in other cases, it is clear that the participants were explicitly told to give greater emphasis to the isolated item (see, e.g., Waugh, 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SR: Cowan and Morey (2007); Logie et al (1990); Sanders and Schroots (1969) CD: Cowan and Morey (2007); Delvenne and Bruyer (2004); Fougnie and Marois (2006); Fougnie and Marois (2009) SR: Smyth and Pendleton (1990) IRec: Depoorter and Vandierendonck (2009) RRec: Depoorter and Vandierendonck (2009) CS: Barrouillet et al (2004); Barrouillet et al (2007); Barrouillet et al (2011); Camos et al (2009); Hudjetz and Oberauer (2007); Liefooghe et al (2008) Brown, Morin, and Lewandowsky (2006) Running memory span: Geiger and Lewandowsky (2008) IRec: C. Morin et al (2010) ROO: Lewandowsky et al (2006) 9.1.2. No temporal isolation effects in forward serial recall and serial recognition (C) SR: Nimmo and Lewandowsky (2005); Nimmo and Lewandowsky (2006) SRec: Farrell and McLaughlin (2007) SR: Peteranderl and Oberauer (2017) SR: Parmentier, King, et al (2006) 9.1.3 Nontemporal isolation effects (B) SR: Smith & Stearns (1949) (anticipation method) IRec: von Restorff (1933)/ Hunt (1995) PR: Calkins (1894) FR: Bireta et al (2008); Welch and Burnett (1924) ROO: Lippman (1980); Lippman and Lippman (197...…”
Section: Multiple-set Effects Within Domains (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%