The influence of incisor inclination and anterior vertical facial height on facial attractiveness in an Asian woman

Ali, Umair; Sukhia, Rashna Hoshang; Fida, Mubassar; Kamal, Adeel Tahir; Abbas, Ausjah

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.030

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The change in MP-SN angle and lower facial height in adult patients also showed negative correlations with the change in VAS score, indicating that an increase of lower facial height in skeletal Class II extraction patient could lead to an undesirable profile. Our results were consistent with the results of Shoukat Ali et al, which concluded that lower facial height significantly influences facial attractiveness, and an increase in lower facial height is considered less attractive [ 29 ]. Hence, vertical control should be considered when treating skeletal Class II extraction patients.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Facial profile evaluation and prediction of skeletal class II patients during camouflage extraction treatment: a pilot study

Guo,

Tian,

et al. 2023

Head Face Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class II patients with camouflage treatment is of great importance for patients and orthodontists. The aim of this study is to explore the key factors in evaluating the facial profile esthetics and to predict the posttreatment facial profile esthetics of skeletal Class II extraction patients. Methods 124 skeletal Class II extraction patients were included. The pretreatment and posttreatment cephalograms were analyzed by a trained expert orthodontist. The facial profile esthetics of pretreatment and posttreatment lateral photographs were evaluated by 10 expert orthodontists using the visual analog scale (VAS). The correlation between subjective facial profile esthetics and objective cephalometric measurements was assessed. Three machine-learning methods were used to predict posttreatment facial profile esthetics. Results The distances from lower and upper lip to the E plane and U1-APo showed the stronger correlation with profile esthetics. The changes in lower lip to the E plane and U1-APo during extraction exhibited the stronger correlation with changes in VAS score (r = − 0.551 and r = − 0.469). The random forest prediction model had the lowest mean absolute error and root mean square error, demonstrating a better prediction accuracy and fitting effect. In this model, pretreatment upper lip to E plane, pretreatment Pog-NB and the change of U1-GAll were the most important variables in predicting the posttreatment score of facial profile esthetics. Conclusions The maxillary incisor protrusion and lower lip protrusion are key objective indicators for evaluating and predicting facial profile esthetics of skeletal Class II extraction patients. An artificial intelligence prediction model could be a new method for predicting the posttreatment esthetics of facial profiles.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Facial profile evaluation and prediction of skeletal class II patients during camouflage extraction treatment: a pilot study

Guo,

Tian,

et al. 2023

Head Face Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The goal of orthodontic treatment should be to create an ideal or functional occlusion and a well-balanced face. This raises a couple of questions, including “Do dental professionals and laypeople have the same perception of which facial esthetics look best?” and, if not, “Which perceptions, those of the professionals or patients, should prevail in treatment planning for orthodontic treatment?” [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two-dimensional (2D) soft tissue facial or cephalometric analyses have been performed to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning to compare soft tissue profiles, optimize facial attractiveness, and investigate soft tissue adaptability to hard tissue [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Although these studies have improved the understanding of facial attractiveness, there was a vulnerability in their evaluation of facial attractiveness because it was investigated primarily in a profile view.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern

Park

Cho

et al. 2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to determine the factors that affect esthetic preference regarding the perceived facial attractiveness of young Korean female adults with a normal skeletal pattern using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). After reorienting the CBCT images of 40 young Korean female adults, three-dimensional (3D) measurements were analyzed, and five 3D facial images were digitally constructed. A computer-based questionnaire was used to determine perceived facial attractiveness by scoring from 1 (very unattractive) to 10 (very attractive). Esthetic perception and the most influential facial view and component were examined and compared by orthodontists, general dentists, and laypeople to evaluate facial attractiveness. Compared to the unattractive group, the attractive group had significantly greater values for Pog-NB, L1SI-FH, U lip thickness, L lip-U lip, and Nasolabial angle, along with significantly lower values for U1SI-FH and Cant of U lip; the attractive group also had a more retruded U1MP (p < 0.01), L1MP (p < 0.01), U lip (p < 0.05), and L lip (p < 0.01) relative to N, as well as a more retruded U lip (p < 0.05) and L lip (p <0.001) relative to esthetic lines. Orthodontists and general dentists were more likely to consider the profile view. When evaluating facial attractiveness, orthodontists and laypeople more often focused on the lips and chin. When evaluating facial attractiveness, all evaluators showed a high esthetic preference for retroclination and retrusion of the incisors and lips, but there were some differences in how they perceived facial attractiveness. Therefore, the ultimate perception of facial attractiveness needs to be based on the esthetic perceptions of laypeople.

show abstract

Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination and anterior vertical facial height

Chen¹,

Liao²

2022

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The influence of incisor inclination and anterior vertical facial height on facial attractiveness in an Asian woman

Cited by 8 publications

References 18 publications

Facial profile evaluation and prediction of skeletal class II patients during camouflage extraction treatment: a pilot study

Facial profile evaluation and prediction of skeletal class II patients during camouflage extraction treatment: a pilot study

A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern

Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination and anterior vertical facial height

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About