2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences

Abstract: a b s t r a c tUser experience seeks to promote rich, engaging interactions between users and systems. In order for this experience to unfold, the user must be motivated to initiate an interaction with the technology. This study explored hedonic and utilitarian motivations in the context of user engagement with online shopping. Factor analysis was performed to identify a parsimonious set of factors from the Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Motivation Scale and the User Engagement Scale based on responses from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
1
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(58 reference statements)
7
94
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee (2005) To summarise, interactivity has been investigated in several studies (Cyr, Head & Ivanov 2009;Cyr, Head, Larios & Pan, 2009;O'Brien 2010;O'Brien & Toms 2010;Teo et al 2003) which extended TAM measures (Venkatesh et al 2003), so whereas the positive influence of interactive features on efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction has been demonstrated, the connection between interactivity and affect and the non-instrumental aspects of UX (e.g. aesthetics) has received less attention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lee (2005) To summarise, interactivity has been investigated in several studies (Cyr, Head & Ivanov 2009;Cyr, Head, Larios & Pan, 2009;O'Brien 2010;O'Brien & Toms 2010;Teo et al 2003) which extended TAM measures (Venkatesh et al 2003), so whereas the positive influence of interactive features on efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction has been demonstrated, the connection between interactivity and affect and the non-instrumental aspects of UX (e.g. aesthetics) has received less attention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These items were drawn from several sources on arousal, hedonics and emotion (Berlyne 1960;Lavie & Tractinsky 2004;Lindgaard, Dudek et al 2011;O'Brien 2010).…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sub-scales from O'Brien's Engagement Scale [21,22] formed the basis of the sub-scales we used in this study to elicit subjects' system evaluations. The Engagement Scale [22] consists of a 31-item scale with 6 sub-scales which measure the following aspects of engagement (number in parenthesis indicates how many items are on each sub-scale): Focused Attention (7), Perceived Usability (8), Endurability (5), Novelty (3), Aesthetics (5) and Felt Involvement (3).…”
Section: User Experience Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Search Effectiveness sub-scale consisted of the items in Table 4. Readers are referred to O'Brien [21] for the content of the other sub-scales. Reliability coefficients for all sub-scales are displayed in Table 5 along with the number of items for each sub-scale.…”
Section: User Experience Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is extrinsic and intrinsic motivations, the second is experience in IS, and the last is theoretical background for the concept of attachment. by O'Brien (2010), both extrinsic and intrinsic motivations are necessary for functionality and pleasure to be a part of user's experience. This will further ensure that the users interaction with a particular system to incorporate emotion, cognition and physicality.…”
Section: ⅱ Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%