1992
DOI: 10.1080/01418619208248003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of grain boundary inclination on the structure and energy of σ = 3 grain boundaries in copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
78
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the materials and temperature differ, it is also interesting to compare the present observations to a previous combined experimental and theoretical study of R3 grain boundaries in Cu, with boundary plane orientations in the h1 1 0i zone [10]. The common feature between Cu and Ni is that they share the fcc crystal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the materials and temperature differ, it is also interesting to compare the present observations to a previous combined experimental and theoretical study of R3 grain boundaries in Cu, with boundary plane orientations in the h1 1 0i zone [10]. The common feature between Cu and Ni is that they share the fcc crystal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In general, the grain boundary energy can vary as a function of all five macroscopic crystallographic parameters (three for lattice misorientation and two for grain boundary plane orientation) that are used to classify a grain boundary. Because of the large number of different grain boundaries, past measurements of grain boundary energies in face-centered cubic (fcc) metals have been made over a limited range of the crystallographic parameters [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In this paper, we report the relative grain boundary energies of nickel as a function of all macroscopic five crystallographic parameters, a quantity that will be referred to as the grain boundary energy distribution (GBED).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in accordance with the calculated boundary energy as a function of the boundary orientation for the <011> tilt twin boundary. Two minima are found, one for the coherent twin, the other for a boundary inclined at 82° with respect to the coherent twin boundary (Wolf et al 1992). Since the ledges are introduced to compensate for a deviation from the exact {111}/{111} boundary orientation, it would be expected that they are spaced rather regularly.…”
Section: Initiation and Propagation Of Cleared Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work examined the grain boundary structures and energies of fcc metals in symmetric and asymmetric tilt grain boundaries. [190][191][192] In general, these studies have shown that the grain boundary has a minimum energy structure that is composed of combinations of structural units (i.e., grain boundary dislocations) from particular low-order coincident site lattice boundaries (low R boundaries, such as the R3 coherent twin boundary). For the interested reader, some recent works have calculated the structures and energies for symmetric/asymmetric tilt/twist/ mixed character grain boundaries in Cu, Ni, and/or Al; [193][194][195] in particular, Olmsted et al 193 explored 388 distinct Ni and Al boundaries to ascertain relationships with grain boundary energy and grain boundary mobility.…”
Section: Grain Boundary (Bicrystal) MD Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%