The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator

Abstract

Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously published extremes of guaranteed union (0.5 mm) and non-union (3 mm) using this model.A femoral osteotomy in 12–14 week old female Wistar rats was stabilised with a micro fixator (titanium blocks, carbon fiber bars) with an osteotomy gap of 1.0 mm (n = 5), 1.5 mm (n = 7), 2.0 mm (n = 6). After five weeks, the left femur was retrieved. The osteotomy gap was scanned using X-ray microtomography and then histologically evaluated. The radiographic union rate (complete mineralised bone bridging across the osteotomy) was three times higher for the 1.0 mm than the 2.0 mm gap. The 1.0 mm gap had the largest callus (0.069μm3) and bone volume (0.035μm3). Callus and bone volume were approximately 50% smaller within the 2.0 mm gap.Using cadaveric rat femurs stabilised with the external fixator, day 0 mechanical assessment of construct stiffness was calculated on materials testing machine displacement vs load output. The construct stiffness for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps was 32.6 ± 5.4, 32.5 ± 2.4, and 32.4 ± 8.3 N/mm (p = 0.779). Interfragmentary strain (IFS) was calculated using the change in osteotomy gap displacement as measured using microstrain miniature differential reluctance transducer spanning the osteotomy gap. Increasing the gap size significantly reduced the IFS (p = 0.013). The mean ‘day 0’ IFS for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps were 11.2 ± 1.3, 8.4 ± 1.5 and 6.1 ± 1.2% respectively.A 1.5 mm gap resulted in a delayed fracture healing by 5 weeks and may represent a useful test environment for fracture healing therapy. Increasing gap size did not affect construct stiffness, but did reduce the ‘day 0’ IFS, with a doubling of non-union and halving of bone volume measured between 1.0 and 2.0 mm gaps.

Preliminary results in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the uncovertebral joint fusion cage in a goat model

“…Previous anatomical studies have shown that the distance of the uncovertebral joint is about 2 mm, which is much shorter than the central height (about 5 to 8 mm) of the intervertebral space in the cervical spine [31]. This may have similar mechanism with fracture healing, which is influenced by the gap size [32]. Second, special biomechanical environment.…”

The role of intermittent PTH administration in conjunction with allogenic stem cell treatment to stimulate fracture healing

“…A total of 48 female Wistar rats, weighing 203 g to 232 g and aged between six and nine months, underwent gaseous anaesthesia. Using anatomical landmarks and a custom precision jig-guide system, 22 four bicortical threaded 1.4 mm stainless steel fixator pins were placed in the craniomedial femur. Pins exited through separate stab incisions and the custom variable spacing fixator was attached.…”

“…In order to analyze the callus in each slice included in the ROI, a shrink wrap protocol was used to stretch over holes < 40 pixels. 22 …”

An examination of two different approaches for the study of femoral neck fracture: Towards a more relevant rodent model

“…We hypothesise that this unconstrained configuration, in which the line of force acting on the femoral neck will not necessarily be para-axial, may thus be more physiologically representative of femoral neck properties. 19…”