2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06960-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of frailty on postoperative complications in geriatric patients receiving single-level lumbar fusion surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a prospective cohort analysis of 668 patients following spine surgery, frailty, as distinguished by risk assessment index, Agarwal et al [16] found that pre-frail and frail patients suffered longer LOS (3.9 d ± 3.6 vs 3.1 d ± 2.8, p < 0.001). Likewise, in a retrospective cohort study of geriatric patients receiving single-level lumbar fusion, after propensity score matching, Shahrestani et al [24] showed signi cantly greater LOS (9.9 ± 10.1 versus 4.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001) in frail patients than non-frail patients. In line with previous studies, we found that after propensity score matching, pre-frail patients had longer LOS (7.21 ± 2.99 versus 6.35 ± 2.66, p = 0.010) than non-frail patients and similar result was found between frail patients and pre-frail patients ( 8.23 ± 3.40 versus 7.06 ± 2.95, p = 0.019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a prospective cohort analysis of 668 patients following spine surgery, frailty, as distinguished by risk assessment index, Agarwal et al [16] found that pre-frail and frail patients suffered longer LOS (3.9 d ± 3.6 vs 3.1 d ± 2.8, p < 0.001). Likewise, in a retrospective cohort study of geriatric patients receiving single-level lumbar fusion, after propensity score matching, Shahrestani et al [24] showed signi cantly greater LOS (9.9 ± 10.1 versus 4.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001) in frail patients than non-frail patients. In line with previous studies, we found that after propensity score matching, pre-frail patients had longer LOS (7.21 ± 2.99 versus 6.35 ± 2.66, p = 0.010) than non-frail patients and similar result was found between frail patients and pre-frail patients ( 8.23 ± 3.40 versus 7.06 ± 2.95, p = 0.019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it cannot be ingored that frailty is signi cantly related to increasing age, which has been veri ed in previous studies [16][17][18]. On the other hand, in previous literatures, patients were dichotomized as non-frailty and pre-frality/frailty groups, without considering pre-frailty as an independent group [16,24]. Hence, in our study, PS matching for age, sex, ASA, fusion levels was used to guarantee comparable clinical characteristics between groups and pairwise comparisions was performed to compare the effects of frailty on complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a prospective cohort analysis of 668 patients following spine surgery and frailty, as distinguished by the risk assessment index, Agarwal et al 16 found that pre-frail and frail patients had longer LOS (3.9 d ± 3.6 vs 3.1 d ± 2.8, p < 0.001). In a retrospective cohort study of geriatric patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion, after PSM, Shahrestani et al 24 showed significantly greater LOS (9.9 ± 10.1 versus 4.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001) in frail than non-frail patients. In line with previous studies, we found that after PSM, pre-frail patients had longer LOS (7.21 ± 2.99 versus 6.35 ± 2.66, p = 0.010) than non-frail patients and a similar result was found between frail patients and pre-frail patients (8.23 ± 3.40 versus 7.06 ± 2.95, p = 0.019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[16][17][18] On the other hand, in previous literatures, patients were dichotomized into non-frail and pre-frail/frail groups, without considering pre-frail as an independent group. 16,24 Therefore, we employed PSM for age, sex, ASA and fusion levels in the present study to guarantee comparable clinical characteristics between groups. Pairwise comparisons were performed to compare the effects of frailty on complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%