1984
DOI: 10.4141/cjas84-038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Feed Energy Level on Growth and Carcass Traits in Bulls of Two Breed Types

Abstract: For personal use only.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the growth traits of the bulls on the different diets were reflections of the digestible energy intake. This is in agreement with the results obtained in other studies (Price et al, 1984;Houseknecht et al, 1988), that growth rate increases as dietary energy intake increases. Although the change in height of bulls on Low diet was lower (Pe0.05) than that of bulls on either High or Choice diet (Table 2), differences in monthly height measurements were not signifcant until April (Fig.…”
Section: Ipsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The differences in the growth traits of the bulls on the different diets were reflections of the digestible energy intake. This is in agreement with the results obtained in other studies (Price et al, 1984;Houseknecht et al, 1988), that growth rate increases as dietary energy intake increases. Although the change in height of bulls on Low diet was lower (Pe0.05) than that of bulls on either High or Choice diet (Table 2), differences in monthly height measurements were not signifcant until April (Fig.…”
Section: Ipsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is well established that cattle finished on high-energy rations will have lighter carcasses (at a constant carcass fat depth), fatter carcasses (at a constant carcass weight), higher levels of marbling and lower cutability than forage-fed cattle (Price et al 1984;Old and Garret 1987;Solomon and Elsasser 1991;Priyanto et al 1993). However, few studies have examined the effects of prolonged backgrounding on pasture on carcass composition of steers that have been finished on a high-energy ration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2) and concentrate mixture of mostly brans (81 %) without grain (Table 1). Geay and Robelin, (1979), and Price et al (1984) showed that diets influence fat deposition independent of the effects of LW, causing cattle fed different diets to vary in carcass fatness even at similar degrees of maturity. The tendency for fat deposition in cattle with tropical inheritance was found lower than that with the temperate ones (Crouse et al,1989 …”
Section: Digestibility Of Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%