2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2022.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of different carbon sources on growth and single cell oil production in oleaginous yeasts Apiotrichum brassicae and Pichia kudriavzevii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the tested carbon sources, only lactose appears to be the least suitable for supporting the growth of both the examined strains, which have probably used the yeast extract present in the medium (YP) to maintain their viability. This possibility was also described by Burgstaller et al ( 2022 ) that reported as the growth of some oleaginous yeast was observed in the respective lactose-containing medium without any decrease in lactose levels as determined by the analytic method. From these observations, we can hypothesize that Z. obscura LS31012019, as well as A. pullulans ATCC 15233, did not possess the enzymatic apparatus able to biochemically elaborate lactose for further processing pathways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Among the tested carbon sources, only lactose appears to be the least suitable for supporting the growth of both the examined strains, which have probably used the yeast extract present in the medium (YP) to maintain their viability. This possibility was also described by Burgstaller et al ( 2022 ) that reported as the growth of some oleaginous yeast was observed in the respective lactose-containing medium without any decrease in lactose levels as determined by the analytic method. From these observations, we can hypothesize that Z. obscura LS31012019, as well as A. pullulans ATCC 15233, did not possess the enzymatic apparatus able to biochemically elaborate lactose for further processing pathways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Acetic acid (C2) accumulates in hydrolysates from diverse biomasses with acetylated sugar backbone chains being considered a main inhibitor in 2nd generation (2G) biorefinery processes [ 4 6 ]. Acetic acid can also be used as a carbon (C) source by several yeast species [ 7 , 8 ], is an inhibitory product of yeast metabolism [ 9 ] and is widely used as food preservative [ 10 ]. Formic acid (C1) is another short-chain inhibitory weak acid present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most biotechnologically important and industrially utilized are specific strains of Yarrowia lipolytica and Rhodotorula toruloides, although other species have gained much attention in recent years [12][13][14] . In comparison, only a few yeast species have been identified for their ability to utilize SCFAs: Y. lipolytica, Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosum, Cutaneotrichosporon curvatum, Naganishia albida, Trichosporon cutaneum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rhodotorula toruloides, Rhodotorula glutinis, Apiotrichum brassicae and Pichia kudriavzevii 2,12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21] . In particular, strains such as Y. lipolytica ACA DC 50 109, Y. lipolytica CICC 31,596, C. curvatum NRRL Y-1511, and C. curvatum ATCC 20,509 have a considerable ability to utilize SCFAs and accumulate lipids [22][23][24] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%