Twenty patients having a standard epidural anaesthetic were randomly assigned to receive 20ml of either carbonated lidocaine 1.73 per cent or lidocaine hydrochloride 2.0 per cent, containing epinephrine 1:200,000. An observer unaware of the solution used measured speed of onset, quality of block, and duration of action. No significant difference was demonstrated in the speed of onset or duration of the block. Carbonated lidocaine gave an improved motor block and showed a trend towards giving fewer missed segments than lidocaine hydrochloride.KEY WORDS: ANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, Regional, Epidural; ANAESTHETICS, Local, carbonated lidocaine.CARBONATED LIDOCAINE is reported to be an improvement over lidocaine hydrochloride with regard to speed of onset and quality of block when used in epidural anaesthesia.l.2 The objectives of this study were to compare the carbonated and hydrochloride preparations of lidocaine in epidural block with respect to speed of onset and quality of block achieved. Previous studies of carbonated lidocaine have not utilized a doubleblind design and thus were open to observer bias. In this study, both the patient and anaesthetist] observer were blinded as to the solution used.
METHODSTwenty patients scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery, after giving informed consent, received an epidural block administered by one anaesthetist. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups receiving either 20 ml of carbonated lidocaine 1.73 per cent (equivalent to lidocaine hydrochloride 2 per cent) or 20 ml of lidocaine hydrochloride two per cent. Both solutions contained freshly added epinephrine to a concentration of 1:200,000 and were injected over approximately 45 seconds through a Tuohy needle positioned in the second lumbar epidural space as identified by a loss of resistance technique. The patient was immediately turned from a lateral to the supine position and the following measurements were made by an observer unaware of which solution had been used: