1977
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90030-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of bandwidth and temporal properties of spatial noise on binocular masking-level differences

Abstract: Abstract-Low-frequency horizontally oriented gratings presented with an 180" vertical interocular phase difference are detected in visual masking noise with nearly one log unit less contrast than gratings with no interocular phase difference. The difference in detectability, the Binocular MaskingLevel Difference (BMLD), does not depend on differences in the temporal characteristics of the signal and noise gratings. Although the BMLD is larger with narrowband noise than with broadband noise, it was not sufficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others also documented that binocular advantage is higher for the in-phase than the out-of-phase condition in contrast discrimination of supra-threshold gratings [25], [26]. The phase-dependent effect in binocular detection is reversed and enlarged when gratings were displayed in either narrowband [41] or broadband [42] visual masking noise. It would also be interesting to investigate binocular combination in external noise [24], [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Others also documented that binocular advantage is higher for the in-phase than the out-of-phase condition in contrast discrimination of supra-threshold gratings [25], [26]. The phase-dependent effect in binocular detection is reversed and enlarged when gratings were displayed in either narrowband [41] or broadband [42] visual masking noise. It would also be interesting to investigate binocular combination in external noise [24], [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Others have also documented that binocular advantage is higher for the in-phase than the out-of-phase condition in contrast discrimination of suprathreshold gratings (Meese, Georgeson, & Baker, 2006; Simmons, 2005). The phase-dependent effect in binocular detection is reversed and enlarged when gratings were displayed in either narrowband (Henning & Hertz, 1973) or broadband (Henning & Hertz, 1977) visual masking noise. It would also be interesting to investigate binocular combination in external noise (Ding & Sperling, 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been limited investigation of whether interocular differences and relative disparity are effective in reducing contrast masking. Binocular detection of a horizontal or vertical grating against narrowband or broadband noise is improved when the gratings are out of phase in each eye (Henning & Hertz, 1973, 1977. When the mask and the target are the same mean frequency and orientation, the improvement in detection is limited to spatial frequencies less than 6 c/deg (Henning & Hertz, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A concern with previous studies on the effect of relative disparity on contrast masking is that the results could be explained by sensitivity to interocular decorrelation. Previous demonstrations of stereo release from masking (Henning & Hertz, 1973, 1977Moraglia & Schneider, 1990, 1992Schneider, Moraglia, & Jepson, 1989) have used two-interval forced-choice detection tasks. It is possible that the advantage conferred by the disparity signal may result from the presence of an additional cue in the interval containing the target (disparity) rather than reflecting a relative improvement in luminance contrast sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%