1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1958.tb03837.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Antigen Strength, Agglutinin and Incomplete Antibody on Agglutination by Anti‐D Sera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Renton and Hancock [5] showed that when titrating mixtures of incomplete and complete anti-D with Rh(D) positive cells, in creasing the proportion of incomplete to complete anti-D might cause a prozone. It was thought possible that in testing some sera in this series, such a prozone might have escaped detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renton and Hancock [5] showed that when titrating mixtures of incomplete and complete anti-D with Rh(D) positive cells, in creasing the proportion of incomplete to complete anti-D might cause a prozone. It was thought possible that in testing some sera in this series, such a prozone might have escaped detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its dimensions, as well as the extent of the pro zone and midzone are influenced by the quantitative antigenic con tent of the blood cells. With anti-Rh sera particularly, the range of antiserum concentration encompassing the postzone is also determin ed by the proportion of complete to incomplete antibody [54,58,64]. and the slope are determined only in the postzone; neither parameter is influenced by the extent of the prozone or mid zone except, of course, when these zones extend to or below the 50% level.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Regression Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Renton and Hancock [12,13] reported on 5 bloods selected from 653 random bloods for their capacity to react in saline suspen sions with incomplete anti-D. These bloods also gave higher scoring values in the blocking reactions with selected sera.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%