2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of additive manufacturing on the micromilling machinability of Ti6Al4V: A comparison of SLM and commercial workpieces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, although it may seem that all oral implant medical devices can be made using 3D printers, a single technology may not be able to meet all patient needs. For some applications, 3D printing technology needs to be combined with milling or other cutting/ finishing techniques, to generate a product that can achieve the final application goal ( de Oliveira Campos et al, 2020).…”
Section: Main Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, although it may seem that all oral implant medical devices can be made using 3D printers, a single technology may not be able to meet all patient needs. For some applications, 3D printing technology needs to be combined with milling or other cutting/ finishing techniques, to generate a product that can achieve the final application goal ( de Oliveira Campos et al, 2020).…”
Section: Main Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other comparative investigation on machinability of wrought, DED-LB/, PBF-EB, and PBF-LB/Ti6Al4V showed that higher hardness of AM material does not necessarily lead to shorter tool life or higher cutting forces in micro-milling. For example, de Oliveira Campos et al [117] observed about 9% lower cutting forces (on average) when machining PBF-LB/Ti6Al4V compared to that of wrought material, despite its ~16% higher hardness. Moreover, lower wear rates, lower burr formation sensitivity, and better surface finish (Ra) were reported in this investigation when machining PBF-LB material.…”
Section: Milling and Micro-millingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning stage dynamics and grain size, the compact and homogeneous microstructure prefers improved stability, densification, and mechanical properties. Typically, except when a multi-material compound is provided in advance, using one single powder bed dispenser for a single metal powder is challenging in the process of in-situ delivery of several substances [46,47].…”
Section: Selective Laser Melting (Slm)mentioning
confidence: 99%