2016
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of a Mouthpiece-Based Topography Measurement Device on Electronic Cigarette User’s Plasma Nicotine Concentration, Heart Rate, and Subjective Effects Under Directed and Ad Libitum Use Conditions

Abstract: No prior study has examined whether mouthpiece-based topography recording devices influence e-cigarette associated nicotine delivery, heart rate, or subjective effects under ad libitum conditions or assessed ad libitum puff topography in experienced individuals using their preferred e-cigarette battery and liquid with a mouthpiece-based computerized device. E-cigarette use significantly increased plasma nicotine concentration and heart rate while suppressing abstinence symptoms. These effects did not differ wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
81
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
81
3
Order By: Relevance
“…EC, iQOS, and conventional cigarettes present very different modes of smoking, not only due to the inherently different working mechanisms of each device, but also because of different individual smoking/vaping habits of the smokers, which can affect the aerosols generated by these devices (Spindle et al 2016). For instance, EC and iQOS do not emit side-stream vapor/smoke between the puffs, while conventional cigarettes continuously emit tobacco smoke even between the puffs.…”
Section: Smoking Protocol and Emission Factor Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC, iQOS, and conventional cigarettes present very different modes of smoking, not only due to the inherently different working mechanisms of each device, but also because of different individual smoking/vaping habits of the smokers, which can affect the aerosols generated by these devices (Spindle et al 2016). For instance, EC and iQOS do not emit side-stream vapor/smoke between the puffs, while conventional cigarettes continuously emit tobacco smoke even between the puffs.…”
Section: Smoking Protocol and Emission Factor Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure transducer and the orifice dimensions of each mouthpiece allowed measurement at puff velocities as low as 3 ml/second. This instrument does not interfere with the nicotine delivery or subjective effects observed after ECIG use (see Spindle et al, 2017). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During each of the two 10-puff ECIG-use bouts, puff topography measures included puff number, puff duration (measured in seconds), puff volume (measured in milliliters) flow rate (i.e., puff velocity measured in milliliters per second), and inter-puff interval (IPI, measured in seconds and defined as the time between the onset of one puff and the onset of a subsequent puff as in Spindle et al, 2017, Vansickel et al, 2010). While puff number and IPI were recorded, they were held constant to 10 puffs and 30 second IPI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nicotine-containing solutions were administered at a rate (3.2 mg/kg/day) that reliably induces nicotine dependence as indicated by elevations in ICSS thresholds (e.g., Epping-Jordan et al, 1998; Manbeck et al, 2013; Roiko et al, 2009). This infusion rate also produces nicotine serum levels (≈40 ng/ml) within the range of those observed in experienced EC users (Farsalinos et al, 2015; LeSage et al, 2002; Spindle et al, 2017). Rats continued to be tested for ICSS Mon-Fri throughout the duration of the 4-week infusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 52%