2013
DOI: 10.1177/1077546313488988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence factors analysis of the best orientation relative to the sun for dual-axis sun tracking system

Abstract: The sunbeam can be converted into electricity via photovoltaic solar cells, and sun trackers are such devices for efficiency improvement. In this paper, different types of sun-tracking systems are reviewed, such as fixed tilt-angle, dual-axis, single-axis with East-West direction, and single-axis with North-South direction. The captured irradiation using different sun trackers are compared, and different influence factors are analyzed to gain the optimal orientation of the sun, such as time error, latitude, az… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underpinned by their PV performance studies in southern Spain, Francisco et al found that in non-south-facing slope terrain, the azimuth of the rotation axis of the uniaxial trackers needs to be adjusted to the same direction as the slope azimuth rather than zero, to maximize the PV energy generation [19]. Leung et al studied the terrain loss of a horizontal single-axis solar-tracking system on a 4% southwest slope, and the results show that the standard inverse tracking had a terrain loss of 2%, while the application of the slope-aware inverse tracking strategy could eliminate the terrain loss successfully [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underpinned by their PV performance studies in southern Spain, Francisco et al found that in non-south-facing slope terrain, the azimuth of the rotation axis of the uniaxial trackers needs to be adjusted to the same direction as the slope azimuth rather than zero, to maximize the PV energy generation [19]. Leung et al studied the terrain loss of a horizontal single-axis solar-tracking system on a 4% southwest slope, and the results show that the standard inverse tracking had a terrain loss of 2%, while the application of the slope-aware inverse tracking strategy could eliminate the terrain loss successfully [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%