1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1978.tb01501.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal naevus-a case report

Abstract: Summary A 32‐year‐old woman is described who showed widespread papular, warty or linear lesions which have remained unchanged over a period of 9 years observation. Clinically and histo‐logically we consider the diagnosis to be inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal naevus. Unusual features were the relatively late onset and the widespread and bilateral distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Does the inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus [38] represent a true nevus? The answer depends on whether or not we consider this as a long-standing disorder.…”
Section: Distinction Between Nevoid Disorders and Nevimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does the inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus [38] represent a true nevus? The answer depends on whether or not we consider this as a long-standing disorder.…”
Section: Distinction Between Nevoid Disorders and Nevimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In the past decade, several authors have defined ILVEN, both clinically and histologically. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] We re viewed their articles for suggestions on treating a teenage girl w ho presented w ith a fairly extensive ILVEN and w hose prim ary concern was cosmetic im provem ent. The fact that so m any different treat m ent m odalities were attem pted in patients with epiderm al nevi suggested to us that no one therapy is uniquely successful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature only 8 bilateral cases have been reported [2][3][4]6,[8][9][10]. Nail changes, as shown by our patient, have not been described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%