The indicators and methods used for measuring urban liveability: a scoping review

Abstract

ObjectivesLiveability is a multi-dimensional and hierarchical concept which consists of various criteria and sub-criteria and may be evaluated in different ways. The aim of this study was to systematically review indicators and methods used for the evaluation of urban liveability in literature.ContentThe five-stage methodological framework of Arksey and O’Malley was used to conduct this scoping review. A systematic search of electronic databases, including Scopus, Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and EBSCO was done until May 29, 2019. Web searching, searching reference lists and hand searching was also conducted to retrieve more relevant articles. Two reviewers screened the papers for eligibility based on the inclusion criteria and extracted their key data and reported them descriptively.SummarySixty seven (67) out of 3,599 papers met the selection criteria. This review showed five distinct domains considered to be important components of liveability. These were Economical, Environmental, Institutional, Social, and Governance (Political) domains. The most important subdomains (indices) which were frequently applied in various studies were Environmental friendliness and Sustainability, Socio-Cultural Conditions and Economic Vibrancy and Competitiveness. We also identified seven different methodologies and six ranking tools used for assessing urban liveability. Among the quantitative methods, three methods accounted for 89.6% of the articles. These methods were the Analytical hierarchy process and entropy (AHP; n=24; 50%), Factor analysis & Principle Component Analysis (FA & PCA; n=12; 25%) and Spatial Multi-criteria Decision-making Method (Spatial; n=7; 14.6%). Among the ranking tools used, three ranking tools accounted for 65.4% of the articles. These tools were the Livable City Scientific Evaluation Standards (LCSES; n=9; 34.6%), The Global Liveable Cities Index (GLCI; n=4; 15.4%) and the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU; n=4; 15.4%).OutlookThis paper discusses and summarizes the latest indicators and methods used for determining urban liveability. The information offered in the review can help future investigators to decide which method suits their purpose and situation better and measure urban liveability more systematically than before.

Neural Network Model Design for Landscape Ecological Planning Assessment Based on Hierarchical Analysis

“…Since bandwidth, traffic parameters of the network, and throughput metrics represent similar attributes and are relatively redundant metrics, only one of them needs to be selected to represent the size of the transmitted data volume in the network [ 18 ]. Any design form that minimizes the damage to the environment is called designed for ecology.…”

“…Different habitat units cause different distributions of organisms, and each distribution is the result of mutual matching between organisms and the environment [ 18 ]. Organisms are influenced by environmental changes and actively select or adapt to different types of habitat units.…”

Evaluation of Community Livability Using Gridded Basic Urban Geographical Data—A Case Study of Wuhan

“…For the sake of community livability evaluation, we need to establish a flexible evaluation model [14][15][16] based on the multi-dimensional factors, such as community development, economic status, physical environment, and resident demands. Traditional methodologies are used to evaluate urban livability, such as qualitative Delphi methods, an analytical hierarchy process (such as the technique for order preference by similarity for ideal solution (TOPSIS) and entropy), cluster analysis, factor analysis, principle component analysis, geographic information system (GIS) and spatial modeling, Economist Intelligence Unit and Mercer city rankings, comprehensive marking or standard method, the livable level integrated index, neural networks and global livable cities index (GLC) [17]. AHP is suitable to transform quantitative and qualitative criteria into numerical scales, which have been extensively utilized in a wide variety of areas [18].…”

Design performance of urban transition house towards livable urban settlement; a case study from Semanggi Surakarta Indonesia

“…Urban liveability is a concept with a multi-dimensional approach and consists of various variables that can be evaluated differently. The understanding of liveability can differ from one community to another and depends largely on cultural background and time context [6]. A livable urban settlement is defined as a settlement structure built with all facilities to meet the basic needs of its citizens to improve their quality of life [5].…”

“…A liveability indicator study conducted in the metropolis of Tehran (Iran) found that to realize livable urban settlement, it needs to be related to aspects of providing land for settlements, office facilities, industry, commercial, green open space urban infrastructure [5]. There are three leading indicators of livability; First, Economic Vibrancy and Competitiveness, which consists of aspects of [6].…”