1996
DOI: 10.2307/2947200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Indians' Old World: Native Americans and the Coming of Europeans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost uniformly, writings on colonial American currencies describe the lack of institutional infrastructure in Euroamerica as the key difference between the American colonial and English economic environments (Nettels ; Priest ; Carruthers and Ariovich ; cf. Miller and Hamell ; Salisbury ). However, the literature does not remark, as it might, on the significance of indigenous presence and the unique dynamics of trade between groups with unshared basic premises about money, trade, land, and the world.…”
Section: Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost uniformly, writings on colonial American currencies describe the lack of institutional infrastructure in Euroamerica as the key difference between the American colonial and English economic environments (Nettels ; Priest ; Carruthers and Ariovich ; cf. Miller and Hamell ; Salisbury ). However, the literature does not remark, as it might, on the significance of indigenous presence and the unique dynamics of trade between groups with unshared basic premises about money, trade, land, and the world.…”
Section: Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the forms in which copper was available, European kettles were by far the most important during early contact (Bradley 1987, p. 131). Native Americans' willingness to exchange abundant goods for copper confounded Europeans' views of market commodity exchange (Martin 1975, p. 113;Salisbury 1996). We see this sentiment in John Smith's (1907, p. 71) observation in 1624 about Virginian Native American communities: "Their manner of trading is for copper, beads, and such like, for which they give such commodities as they have, as skins, foule, fish, flesh and their Country Corne."…”
Section: Kettles In Early Contact: Their Social Lives and The Trade Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is enigmatic because its signature in both the archaeological and historical record is light compared to what came before, the true "prehistoric" period, and what came after, the true "historic" period. It is thus a shadowy period, called sometimes the protohisotoric, yet the events of this time are crucial to understanding the transition from pre-to post-contact times (Ehrhardt 2005, p. 3;Hamell 1986/87;Salisbury 1996;Walthall and Emerson 1992). Identifying the earliest contexts and processes of persistence and change in Native material and social systems is both vitally important and challenging (Ehrhardt 2005, p. 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the myth of property rights, historical evidence points to a virtual absence of broad collective involvement of early Native Americans in economic initiatives other than in community-organized trading events and in the enforcement of certain externalities such as overgrazing (Herskovits, 1940;Holder, 1970;Shipek, 1987;Salisbury, 1996;Anderson, 1997a, b;Rubin, 1999). In fact, with the exception of piracy and raidingwhich, for obvious reasons, was more a tribal band initiative-the vast majority of Native American business enterprises were either individual-or family-based, and, in these aspects, they did not differ from the vast majority of their contemporaneous European counterparts.…”
Section: False Myth Two: Indigenous Populations Historically Had a Momentioning
confidence: 99%