1984
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1984.03340480047026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incidence of Facial Injuries From Dog Bites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…20 The actual incidence of facial fractures relating to dog attacks is currently unknown. Schalamon et al, 1 Karlson, 3 and Palmer and Rees 16 documented no maxillofacial fractures in their review of facial dog bite injuries, and Tu et al 20 suggested that facial fractures may occur in less than 5% of dog attack incidents. 131620 When a maxillofacial fracture is encountered, the most frequent bones to be fractured are the orbital, nasal, and maxillary bones, constituting 78% of the documented dog bite facial fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 The actual incidence of facial fractures relating to dog attacks is currently unknown. Schalamon et al, 1 Karlson, 3 and Palmer and Rees 16 documented no maxillofacial fractures in their review of facial dog bite injuries, and Tu et al 20 suggested that facial fractures may occur in less than 5% of dog attack incidents. 131620 When a maxillofacial fracture is encountered, the most frequent bones to be fractured are the orbital, nasal, and maxillary bones, constituting 78% of the documented dog bite facial fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schalamon et al, 1 Karlson, 3 and Palmer and Rees 16 documented no maxillofacial fractures in their review of facial dog bite injuries, and Tu et al 20 suggested that facial fractures may occur in less than 5% of dog attack incidents. 131620 When a maxillofacial fracture is encountered, the most frequent bones to be fractured are the orbital, nasal, and maxillary bones, constituting 78% of the documented dog bite facial fractures. 2021 The mechanism of injury in cases of maxillofacial fracture is thought to be the consequence of the mandible (or involved bone) being physically held by the dogs jaws, which is capable of delivering immense force to the area of bone contacted by the dog’s teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of dog-bite injuries in children below the age of fifteen is thought to be 22 in 1000 every year [2]. Similar high incidences have also been reported by Karlson [3] and Shaikh and Worrall[4], who documented dog bites as the cause of facial injury in 27.4% of children under the age of seven years old [3, 4]. The reason for these high occurrences in young children has been attributed to lack of awareness of the potential danger from animals and the closer proximity children have to dogs as a result of their stature [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The actual incidence of facial fractures relating to dog attacks is currently unknown. Schalamon et al [14], Karlson [3], and Palmer and Rees [9] documented no maxillofacial fractures in their review of facial dog-bite injuries, and Tu et al [13] suggested that facial fractures may occur in less than 5% of dog attack incidents [3, 9, 13, 14]. When a maxillofacial fracture is encountered, the most frequent bones to be fractured are the orbital, nasal, and maxillary bones, constituting 78% of the documented dog-bite facial fractures [13, 15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinder sind bei den okulären (und fazialen) Bissverletzungen deutlich überrepräsentiert [13,26,28,41,61,76]. Folgende Gründe können dafür angeführt werden: -Aufgrund ihrer geringen Körpergröße werden Kinder häufiger im Gesicht erfasst als Erwachsene, die Bissverletzungen vor allem an den oberen und unteren Extremitäten erleiden.…”
Section: Bissverletzungen Am Augeunclassified